![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 03-05-2021 at 11:35 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Jim65; 03-05-2021 at 01:16 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The Plot Thickens....... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think there's a major problem asking for offers to determine value of the Jackie.
There's a huuuuge difference between what people 'think' is it's value, based on things as varied as what THEY would feel comfortable paying theoretically if they had the money, to what they last saw one sell at (could be 6 months previous), to even personal discrimination based on the issue itself or it's aesthetics. Getting hard offers from buyers willing to commit their funds to a real purchase is a series of true numbers you can work from realistically and refer to. Of course, with every offer the OP should have been contacting the interested party to let them know why he had created the BST thread, to thank them for their interest and to ask if they would not bomb the exercise for a pre-determined time so he could gather enough evidence. No idea if the OP did this though. He should have then started a fresh thread to discuss why he made the Sale thread and to encourage discussion of his situation. Being called to do so by others sure makes him seem less hobby pure and creates the idea he might have actually been willing to let go of his problem to someone else for the right number. Last edited by 68Hawk; 03-05-2021 at 01:48 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
His original listing says $55,000. It doesn't say "or BO", nowhere does it even mention offers. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My two cents - first off it's sad that the hobby needs to deal with this situation and will have to continue to do so thanks to those who are willing (and greedy enough) to alter cards for profit.
Second, when it comes to this board, I would have reached out to Leon to clear this experiment by him before posting. It's his board, he's done an excellent job of running it and he deserves the respect of a heads-up on something like this. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Far too invested in the hobby to burn someone else with a possibly trimmed card. I also don't blame the guy who sold it to me on ebay. I'm sure he had no idea. Quote:
Quote:
End of the day, the plan worked. I was able to get real market rate offers having placed card on multiple platforms in order to show PSA. And as a bonus generated some talk about this situation so I can leverage with PSA.
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 03-05-2021 at 02:51 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB 1948 leaf Jackie Robinson | JohnnyKilroy | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 01-27-2021 03:28 PM |
wtb 1948 leaf Jackie Robinson | sportscardpete | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 05-06-2019 05:39 AM |
FS: 1948 Leaf #79 Jackie Robinson | poorlydrawncat | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-25-2013 03:27 PM |
WTB 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson | poorlydrawncat | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-08-2013 10:35 PM |
1948-49 Leaf Jackie Robinson | SmokyBurgess | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-04-2009 07:19 AM |