 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-22-2021, 10:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I suppose you have a point about where the cutoff should be. When I started collecting as a kid in 1989 50s cards were certainly considered vintage. I would assume 60s as well. An 82 Ripken is now older than a 52 Mantle was back then.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. Last edited by pokerplyr80; 02-22-2021 at 10:14 PM. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| National-From a vintage autograph perspective | tazdmb | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 07-31-2017 11:50 AM |
| Cobb - a new (or old?) perspective | mckinneyj | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 2 | 04-28-2016 08:38 PM |
| Crossovers From SGC's Perspective | spacktrack | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 05-25-2010 04:15 PM |
| Brian Cat, a slightly different perspective | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-09-2007 11:32 AM |
| A little perspective and courtesy please | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-01-2006 10:28 PM |
Hybrid Mode
