![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Curious to other PreWar guys.
Do we REALLY need the qualifiers? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have never seen the need for Qualifiers on any card. The final grade is what it is. I couldn't care less about edge numbers, corner numbers or anything else.
Last edited by Frank A; 02-19-2021 at 08:45 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I hope CSG is indeed reading this and can respond to some of the Forum's basic concerns. As the "new kid on the block", you'd think/hope they would be extra-responsive to consumer inquiries. If people get the sense that GSC cares (and is responsive), it would give them an immediate leg up on their current competition. I agree that the smaller square slab for Tobacco/Caramel cards may not be feasible or cost effective. But hopefully (especially as a new advertiser here) they can at least provide a response to concerns over the flip size and color, as it pertains to smaller-sized cards that are 100+ years old. There is just no way that the flip size should be comparable to the cards themselves! Last edited by perezfan; 02-19-2021 at 11:40 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have been using SGC because I like the look of their slabs. I have about a dozen cards on my wall that were graded by PSA or Beckett, and a dozen or so raw cards. I had planned on sending them to SGC, but with the current mess at SGC I will hold off.
I agree with many of the other posters about the CSG slabs. They aren't very attractive and they haven't explained about their plans to keep the smaller cards from sliding around. (The photo is actually a vertical wall. ![]()
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
........ known as the great "Boscobellringer"
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In Wisconsin, we keep our cards on a horizontal wall so they don't fall off during natural disasters.
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My first thought was that the flip looked a little large but that has me comparing to PSA and SGC.
I also remember when I first saw graded cards I thought they were just encased for protection and authenticated as real. I liked that idea at the time better than a number grade. Pre war cards could just be authenticated and on the back list qualifiers trimmed, altered, color added restored etc. BUY the card and not the holder!
__________________
TOP T206 WANTS *DRUM *CHarlie Rhodes errors & oddities Also would like to add a few AMERICAN BEAUTIES 350 frame,no frame and/or 460 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the 'current mess' at SGC?
__________________
Deals Done: GrayGhost, Count76, mybuddyinc, banksfan14, boysblue, Sverteramo, rocuan, rootsearcher60, GoldenAge50s, pt7464, trdcrdkid, T206.org, bnorth, frankrizzo29, David Atkatz, Johnny630, cardsamillion, SPMIDD, esehombre, bbsports, babraham, RhodeyRhode, Nate Adams, OhioCardCollector, ejstel, Golfcollector, Luke, 53toppscollector, benge610, Lunker21, VintageCardCo, jmanners51, T206CollectorVince, wrm, hockeyhockey Collecting: T206 Monster #236 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The current mess at SGC is the raise in prices, coupled with missed deadlines. My last order took 4 months for them to grade. Add in the loss of the registry and the new pop report that made it even more inaccurate than the previous version, it all adds up to a mess.
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I remember several years ago SGC was great. I used to talk a lot with Earl Johnson whom worked there. Not sure what happened to him but he was a great guy. Turn around times used to be on point and never had issues with customer service. Just my opinion but it fell apart when they moved from parsipanny to florida……….or again it just seemed that way.
__________________
Successful Transactions with: CardPadre, cammb, jim, sean1125,bobbyw8469, vintagetoppsguy, mintacular, rube26105, irishdenny, brick, Robextend,dboneesq, northviewcats, wdwfan, Dhogan, quitcrab, eliminator, Harliduck, tonyo, fetamore, hcv123, Bocabirdman, Casey2296,Aplyon86 Futbowl, pwang100, GoCubsGo32, Sidepocket, jcarroll84, DanP, YazFenway08, 4reals, sflayank, frazier and many others |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Deals Done: GrayGhost, Count76, mybuddyinc, banksfan14, boysblue, Sverteramo, rocuan, rootsearcher60, GoldenAge50s, pt7464, trdcrdkid, T206.org, bnorth, frankrizzo29, David Atkatz, Johnny630, cardsamillion, SPMIDD, esehombre, bbsports, babraham, RhodeyRhode, Nate Adams, OhioCardCollector, ejstel, Golfcollector, Luke, 53toppscollector, benge610, Lunker21, VintageCardCo, jmanners51, T206CollectorVince, wrm, hockeyhockey Collecting: T206 Monster #236 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Appears if you want sub grades you pay $10/card extra for those. Do I have that right? RayB
__________________
Legacy Board Member Since 2009. Hundreds of successful transactions here on Network 54. Buy/Sell/Trade with Confidence. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes you're right... not really nominal for cheaper cards. Somewhat nominal when looking at a percentage of the fees for high-end cards.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looking at it from the angle of keeping costs down, a gasketed holder makes the most sense. Even with modern CNC machining, a set of dies for injection molding is a big investment.
3D printing has potential, but right now it's painfully slow, and isn't great for clear stuff. So a size that can hold most "regular" cards and a gasket to adjust the size is the most cost effective. I've thought for years that the gasket could be made in different colors. That would allow some customizing, like team colors, or even just a lighter choice for cards like 71 Topps or 50 Drakes. I knew the square "thing" I mocked up wouldn't appeal to everyone, it's what I could do with the old image and paint in a few minutes. Plenty of room for improvement. There's really no big reason most T size cards couldn't be in a small slab. the 3x4 size of a toploader could be pretty good. I've been trying to figure out a slab with a pocket to contain a detailed report/certificate. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The only qualifiers I would need are trimmed, colored, or altered.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grading Company, which one? | Kiddk1 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 10-08-2018 11:45 AM |
ISA Grading company ? | Ribbens | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-19-2018 03:56 PM |
which grading company ? | larietrope | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 11-06-2016 04:30 PM |
SGC Grading Company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 03-19-2009 09:44 AM |
Anyone know anything about this grading company? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 04-11-2006 08:43 PM |