![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll give you an example of my 53 Bowman Berra and Musial; I believe they would have been qualified if graded by PSA. However, I think they received an overall lower grade due to the centering.
Last edited by Tere1071; 02-15-2021 at 09:59 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Phil. That's useful guidance.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My current thinking on the matter after watching a lot of YouTube videos is that SGC is slightly more lenient on MC than PSA.
Back in the day, "MC" was generally understood as cards that were so OC they were missing entire borders, showing part of the adjacent card on the other border, etc. etc. But here lately, PSA has also been known to reject vintage cards as miscut due to things like egregious tilt, diamond cutting, or just wonkiness where the card may be like 1/16 factory large in one direction and things like that. SGC may be tougher in this regard than they were 10 years ago, (they sure as hell have gotten tougher on centering...) but I have seen them even recently be willing to slab cards that have slight cut irregularities that I feel like PSA probably would not. My $0.02. Thanks.
__________________
Prewar Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 02-17-2021 at 08:27 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks John - appreciate it. 2-3 of the cards I'm thinking of are like Phil's Yogi Berra (or even a bit more OC), so his photo and your comment suggest that sticking with SGC may be best as I'll get a better looking holder without the grading being punative. Fingers crossed!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Prewar Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 02-16-2021 at 08:44 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you were to submit those to PSA and ask for "no qualifiers", I'm sure they would come back with regular grades. Neither of those look MC, just off-center which they aren't required to note. If a card is a 7, but would be 7 OC, they just make it a straight PSA 5. Many people prefer a straight grade and will request it to avoid qualifiers.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Prewar Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
grading cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-16-2006 02:37 PM |
Grading strip cards and hand cut cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-06-2005 12:16 PM |
Fro Joy cards - grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 01-08-2005 10:15 PM |
Grading Pre-WW2 cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-21-2004 06:34 AM |
AAA Grading cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-30-2002 08:30 AM |