![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: How much more will you pay for great centering, same grade and look otherwise? | |||
No More |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
48 | 16.27% |
10%-20% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
124 | 42.03% |
30% - 40% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
74 | 25.08% |
50% - 60% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 9.83% |
70%-80% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 2.03% |
90%-100% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 0.68% |
More than 100% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 4.07% |
Voters: 295. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The standard to have an OC qualifier for a 7 would be worse than 75/25. So, an otherwise mint card like that if qualifiers were left off would ostensibly top out at a straight 6 - since the standard for a 6 is 80/20 or better. Make sense? If given the choice, I'd rather have the straight grade with no qualifier. But no, in terms of eye appeal of the card - it doesn't really matter.
__________________
Prewar Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 01-31-2021 at 11:55 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've always been a corners guy, but this one seems pretty special in retrospect
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB Fisk RC in NM or NM-MT with great centering | jandr272 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2017 08:23 PM |
FS: Scoops Carey, SL, PSA 5, Great Centering | GregMitch34 | T206 cards B/S/T | 1 | 12-15-2015 12:18 PM |
FS: Fred Clarke, PSA 6, Great Centering | GregMitch34 | T206 cards B/S/T | 4 | 08-17-2015 07:07 PM |
FS: e120 Kelleher SGC 50--Great Centering | GregMitch34 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 02-10-2014 04:45 PM |
FS: Eddie Collins, e93, great centering | GregMitch34 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 08-20-2012 09:24 AM |