Are cards with older PSA cases worth less?

[perezfan]

Originally Posted by swarmee

Nope; people who ask PSA that question get banned. Steve Sloan and Joe Orlando have a real bug in their butt about 00000001.

I wonder how the new management team (hopefully there'll be one in place soon) will respond to these justified, rational and inevitable inquiries?

I wonder if banning, canceling and censoring will be their "go to" protocol as well.

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by perezfan

I wonder how the new management team (hopefully there'll be one in place soon) will respond to these justified, rational and inevitable inquiries?

I wonder if banning, canceling and censoring will be their "go to" protocol as well.

The first thing they should do is design a new flip. Then announce all cards graded before that flip does not qualify for the grade guarantee. Not fair for them to guarantee work they had nothing to do with.

[swarmee]

Originally Posted by bnorth

The first thing they should do is design a new flip. Then announce all cards graded before that flip does not qualify for the grade guarantee. Not fair for them to guarantee work they had nothing to do with.

That's a page out of the SGC book. Although if they did that, they wouldn't have any topcover of having to self-insure the grade guarantee with their progressive grading fees. Not that the market seems to care.

[Exhibitman]

Originally Posted by bnorth

The first thing they should do is design a new flip. Then announce all cards graded before that flip does not qualify for the grade guarantee. Not fair for them to guarantee work they had nothing to do with.

Boy, would that be a fun class action unfair trade practices case to litigate. Kill your guarantee after people have paid you in reliance on it just to extract new fees from them...yeah, I am going to guess that the CU legal department would have kittens if anyone proposed it.

[Frank A]

Of coarse not. That's just a gimmick to get people to resubmit. What a bunch of bologna.