 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
01-10-2021, 09:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Ya know, I've always rated the '54 set lower than most of the '50s Topps sets. Something about the missing top border (I'm an engineer) and the mixture of color and black and white photos. But......it is growing on me and I think the more I see of the cards together, the more I'm coming around.
On another '54 note, one of the main cards from the set that I did not have was the Ernie Banks RC. However I was recently digging through some long, lost cards and came across a zip-lock bag of '50s Topps and Bowman cards that sometime ago had sustained water damage. In that pile was a Banks, or what was left of a Banks. Per another thread that showed a PSA 3 '56 Aaron, I'm hoping for at least a '2' on this one.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: Eye Appealing PSA 1/1.5 Lou Gehrig, Jackie Robinson Leaf and Bowman | AnkurJ | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-16-2020 07:24 PM |
| Second year cards that look more appealing then the Rookie | Rookiemonster | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 43 | 01-28-2016 05:47 AM |
| Suggestions for some visually appealing non-RC HoF | ThePumaLives | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 01-07-2016 06:37 AM |
| Monster aficionados, which 5 cards from the set do you find most visually appealing? | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 09-14-2013 06:11 AM |
| Most visually appealing sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 06-23-2005 09:22 AM |
Hybrid Mode
