![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whether you love them or hate them, I think PWCC has identified and exploited a flaw in the grading system. We all know that not all PSA (or SGC, etc.) 4s are the same. I have owned PSA 2.5s that are objectively nicer in hand than many PSA 6s. Eye appeal matters a lot in evaluating a card, and visually appealing cards for a given grade should sell at a premium. I think PWCC's eye appeal system is brilliant marketing.
All that having been said, my opinion of eye appeal is well centered cards without creases. I don't care about corners and edges. For other collectors, good corners and edges are the number one factor in evaluating eye appeal, and creasing/centering don't matter. I don't know how PWCC can consistently designate a card as having strong eye appeal for something that is such a personal opinion. I also wouldn't put it past them to have ulterior motives in designating certain cards as having strong eye appeal. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How many marketing emails is too many? | steve B | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 02-18-2019 07:30 AM |
Marketing 101 | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-28-2017 10:45 AM |
Calling all you clever folk! | Jeff_cvc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 98 | 05-30-2015 09:38 AM |
New '52 Mantle Forgery...This one is clever | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 29 | 04-15-2013 01:59 PM |
Clever Fake? (t206 Magee) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-28-2004 11:28 AM |