![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Do you think it is OK to "keyword spam" Ebay auctions? | |||
Yes, it is OK to put PSA and BVG into titles of SGC cards!!! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 3.36% |
No, the auction title should ONLY have the grader who graded the card!!! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
111 | 74.50% |
I could care less either way!! Whatever the seller wants to do is fine with me! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 22.15% |
Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’m seeing more and more sellers either list their cards as PSA, SGC, BVG numerically graded and they are not .. or just putting a numerical grade on themselves. Deans and STARX have been doing that all along which has zero credibility w/me but I guess in the bigger picture it’s not much different than anyone listing their cards as EX, EX/MT, etc.
Some of this stuff, obviously, is purposely meant to deceive. This clown below keeps listing his SGC graded cards as a grade higher on PSA. https://www.ebay.com/itm/1970-Topps-...0AAOSw-ktfqyRq Last edited by Edwolf1963; 12-31-2020 at 09:54 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"keyword spamming" of any kind drives me crazy. When I do a search for a certain card or product, I don't want to sift through all the unwanted junk just to find what I was looking for to begin with.
Ebay just sent me a survey to fill out, and I let them know how I feel about the "keyword spamming". I'm sure there will big changes at Ebay when they read my survey! ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I search for "WWII baseball." Every day I have to ignore some card from 5 years ago because it's listed as "post WWII baseball." Very annoying.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think "Reprint" should be required to be in the title of all reprints (/fakes/counterfeits).
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
No matter how many filters I apply, the reprints and Topps 206 seem to dominate the search results.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The results are sort of how I anticipated them to be.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I typically don't limit my searches on cites to any particular grader. I just enter the year, player, and card manufacturer.
I want to see all the active listings - raw and graded, as well as from all graders. It doesn't bother me that a listing will say, "1933 John Doe ABC 5; Not XYZ or WXY." Sure, I have a grading preference, but am always willing to buy cards from my non-preferred grading companies if the price is right. So, my bottom line is no big deal. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" | mightyq | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2014 01:28 PM |
Rizzuto & Slaughter "Real" RC Debate | Robextend | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 15 | 08-07-2011 01:06 PM |
the "Who's greater" debate | Touch'EmAll | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 11 | 10-01-2010 11:11 AM |
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 135 | 08-12-2007 11:10 PM |
Last night's "debate" .....some interesting observations. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 04-25-2004 06:52 PM |