![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i didn't think factory sets were a thing until the 80's - could be wrong.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There were no factory sets in 1971, but some dealers in the 70’s sold complete sets (Fritsch, Galasso, etc.). Presumably he means he got one of these.
Topps cards in 2020 don’t even all measure the same size, open a pack and look carefully at the cards in a stack and you can see the difference. Plenty of legit over and undersize 1971’s. Impossible to issue any judgement without pics, but size isn’t the be all and end all of trimming. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the tips - I actually was just reading about how they didn't have factory sets in 1971. The seller's exact words were "My 71 and 72 cards were a Christmas present back in 72 and 73 as complete sets from the manufacturer." Not sure what to make of that, as memories can obviously be imperfect from that long ago. Could be referring to a vending box.
I've examined the cards some more, and I can't find any noticeable differences in feel or appearance (with or without magnification) between the vertical edges and the horizontal, which are presumably not trimmed as the cards are the standard height. I'm attaching a few photos of the Clemente with another '72, to the extent that they may be helpful. Thanks again, everyone. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A complete set bought in 71-72 would almost certainly have come from a seller like Fritsch and assembled from vending. Cards from vending boxes are often a bit undersized.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you all for this very helpful and informative discussion. Based on everything I've learned, I've gotten pretty comfortable that the cards are legit, and so I canceled the return request. If that's a mistake, it's not an expensive one, and oh well - I've got some nice-looking cards in my collection. The Bench looks like it might be better than one that went for almost 50% more from Morris yesterday.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I have always been curious as to how the cutting process differed from cutting cards for packs versus cutting cards for vending? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Possibly, vending cards were purposely cut a hair smaller to limit their getting hung up in the card vending machines.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's sort of a balancing act between what you paid for the cards and what the chances are that something is wrong here. First off, many here will tell you that the cards they bought in the 60's and 70's definitely showed occasional variance in sizing, so it is definitely not out of the question that those cards were born that way. But you have to decide whether or not a full 1/16 of an inch is sketchy or not. That is a significant difference. You've already stated that you have no reason to either believe the seller or not believe the seller, so you have to ask yourself a few pertinent questions:
1. Do the edges under magnification look as they should? Is there a way to take pics of your 10X magnification and post them here for some of the guys to look at? 2. How do the prices paid stack up? Did you get the cards on the cheap, or can you get the same cards/conditions for close to or at the same prices elsewhere? If it's the latter, then you may be saving yourself a lot of heartache by just returning them now and putting it all behind you. If they were low priced, but there's a possibility of them being deemed 'wrong' in the future, you have to decide whether the amount paid makes keeping them a non-issue. 3. Do you plan on getting the cards graded? If you shelled out a lot of money for them and they eventually come back as ungradeable due to sizing, you are going to scream like a banshee!!! I know what I'm talking about. In Bobby's last group sub, I had 4 cards returned unsuitable (N6: MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENT), three 1971's (including a Nolan Ryan!) and a 1961 Babe's 60th Homer. All were measured out beforehand and examined closely while laying atop a modern card, and they were the perfect size, yet I still got screwed...with no explanation from PSA, of course.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() Last edited by JollyElm; 12-16-2020 at 02:36 PM. Reason: Dang it! You posted scans whie I was typing. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Do you have similar pics of the other side of the card? If it was a trim job, who's to say which side got sliced.
On a logic note, I'm not an expert, but when a card is trimmed using a paper cutter, X-Acto knife or whatever, there is a lot of force exerted downward on the card, so the very edge would sorta curve down a microscopic amount...if you know what I mean. A card coming out of the factory almost 50 years ago would have had plenty of time for that edge to re-elevate and match the rest of the card. So, if the edge sort of minutely curves downward, that is a reason for concern.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() I do maybe see a tiny downward curve, but again, I don't have any experience in this sort of thing and it could just be the power of suggestion. And all the edges of the card look pretty much the same. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've sold only a single card on ebay in the last 15 years, but that's it, as I'm a trader at heart.
Perhaps the most important point you made was how all of the edges seemingly match each other. Someone overthinking it would say, "Well maybe the card was a little large to begin with, so he cut all four sides," but that may be a leap too far. If the cards don't jump out at you as being trimmed, look fine next to their counterparts, and you got them at a great price, I think I know whether or not you're going to keep them. ![]()
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I have cards from 1910 that still have that edge quality, despite being in P-F condition. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When were factory sets produced? I've seen collectors comment on seeing/receiving Factory sets ordered out of Sears/JC Penney catalogs around 1974-1975. I took a quick look thru their catalog offerings and did not find any sets for sale.
https://christmas.musetechnical.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks guys!
John - I've been following your progress over on the 52T thread. Very cool that you're so close. Darren - do you also sell on eBay? For some reason I think I might have seen your name on a receipt or something. Anyway, to answer your questions: 1. Do the edges under magnification look as they should? I don't have enough experience to know, unfortunately. They look smoother than a few other 71s and 72s I looked at under magnification, but the other cards were in lesser grades overall. I don't notice any difference between the L/R edges and the T/B edges of the cards, so that would seem to weigh against trimming. 1a. Is there a way to take pics of your 10X magnification and post them here for some of the guys to look at? -- I don't think so. 2. How do the prices paid stack up? Pretty well, I'd say - they are among the best (and possibly the best?) raw examples of those particular cards I've seen on eBay (granted, only in the last month), and I paid an average of about a PSA 4 price for them. 3. Do you plan on getting the cards graded? Almost certainly not. I think about as much of PSA as you seem to, and these are for my collection, which I don't want to lock away in slabs. It's more that as someone who is just learning about the hobby in 2020 after being gone for a long time, I want to make sure I don't get suckered. Also would not like the cards to be worthless if I do decide to sell them at some point, of course. Last edited by ASF123; 12-16-2020 at 03:28 PM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vintage Collector Trimmed Article And Thoughts | mferronibc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 05-06-2020 06:00 PM |
"Possibly doctored" cards at the National..... | DJCollector1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 63 | 07-21-2019 06:07 PM |
FS: Rare Pre-War Signed Cards - Many Possibly Unique - Taking Offers Give It A Shot | btcarfagno | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 2 | 10-28-2015 07:26 AM |
Would you be able to detect a trimmed T206 card that was, as trimmed, properly sized? | esquiresports | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 04-12-2013 10:52 AM |
Re; Earlier post regarding Psa-6 T206 Cobb on Ebay possibly trimmed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-19-2005 08:31 PM |