![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
J |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1974 was my second year collecting. I got a ton of those ugly traded cards. Of course they were part of the set as they were in every pack of cards. But I learned a few years ago when I started collecting again that the standard convention is to sell the traded set separately and if sold with the set it is more like bonus cards. An inexperienced collector like I was until recently would not know this.
__________________
Brian "Tony" Levinson Buying or trading for lesser condition Butterfingers Always looking for raw lesser condition vintage baseball and football --small or large lots. Member of Old Baseball Cards |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The wax boxes all say "all 660 cards in one series"
The box topper ad says "all 660 cards in one series" Just because they made a special post season set for a large retail customer does not mean the traded were part of the main set. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The box topper ad in later boxes says now includes traded cards. Why did Topps put multiples of traded cards in most packs if they didn't intend them to be part of the set? Most collectors would already have most if not all the regular cards. Topps clearly didn't intend for them to be inserts or chase cards. They wanted collectors to get lots of them.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As you stated later in the season they inserted Traded cards. A typical Topps marketing strategy to add an insert set. Most boxes did not contain traded cards.
By the way this is a 1982 Topps Factory set and it did not include the traded cards. Now you could argue that there were no traded cards in packs but in 1985 traded cards were issued in wax and as a box set but the Factory sets only included the base set again no traded. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if it's called a "traded set", why would it part of the "regular set"?
parsing words to say a "complete set" should include both is pretty ridiculous in my view. sorry to see this happening. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who is in charge of this hobby anyway ? Let's ask them the official position.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought you were at least on the board Al???
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When were the Traded cards called a set by Topps? The fact that Topps issued it as part of a complete set tells me all I need to know.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Why is it ridiculous when Topps issued a complete set and it included the Traded cards?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I disagree on both points 1972 Traded cards are clearly part of the set. One of the ways to tell that is they are on the checklist.
1974 Traded cards have there own checklist because they are an insert set. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about selling a near complete 1954 Topps set | ColumbiaComics | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-03-2018 12:09 PM |
What constitutes a perfectly centered T206? | mechanicalman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-26-2015 09:54 AM |
Question about grading complete sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-25-2009 07:31 PM |
Question: I am trying to complete the E-91 set (A,B,C) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-21-2006 03:52 PM |
I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 01:42 PM |