![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So is this looking mostly at colors or is it somehow looking a three dimensional attributes - say an indentation in the card?
Also, are the detractions things that would have been present on Day 1 - when it was pulled from a pack in 1982 or are they generally things that happened to the card during the ensuing 38 years? BTW, I really like what you are doing here.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-66) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is why you always add the information to the long thread already about this... maybe Leon can merge them?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keep up the great work!
No such thing as a "perfect system", but this seems like it will be a heck of a lot more consistent than humans! Last edited by hcv123; 10-19-2020 at 06:00 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Out with the old, in with the new, the future is here. There's a new sheriff in town. Great video.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How will you know if this system is better than professional graders ? Based on the information you have shared so far it is about the same. Will you determine the system is valid if it relates closely to the professional graders or if there is a big difference etc . ? So you also need good reliability ( use same card and get same grade ) and validity . How are the results so far with reliability ? Good Luck on this venture. Corners and borders for most cards should be easier I would think to program into grades.
__________________
Wanted : Detroit Baseball Cards and Memorabilia ( from 19th Century Detroit Wolverines to Detroit Tigers Ty Cobb to Al Kaline). |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If machine grading ever gets to market I wonder if they will put the software version used to create the grade on the slab? Because software always can improve and engineers are never satisfied, I would imagine that the software will continue to get upgraded regularly unless they are forced to lock it down and have strict configuration control. This usually doesn't happen in private industry.
I can imagine collectors in the future arguing about which software version was used to grade the card they are trying to buy. Maybe it might look something like this: Last edited by GasHouseGang; 10-19-2020 at 08:51 PM. Reason: Add example. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How does the computer figure in the all important eye appeal?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-66) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Automated Card Grading - Surface | kevinlenane | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 04-22-2021 07:15 PM |
Automated Card Authentication | kevinlenane | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 04-08-2020 03:30 PM |
Raw Goudey Set Pictures - Automated Card Grading, Authentication and Tamper Detection | kevinlenane | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-05-2020 04:15 AM |
Looking to buy some stuff- Action Figures, Video Games, Magic the Gathering | Ed_Hutchinson | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 4 | 04-18-2018 09:53 AM |
PSA Grading Video | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 07-20-2004 07:41 PM |