![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’ve been searching through past threads and this one seems appropriate for my question. I recently bought a WaJo Portrait. I’m relatively new to T206’s (this is my 8th). When I got it in hand and saw it next to my other T206’s the proportions looked off. Tall and skinny. I checked the edges with a loupe and see no evidence of trimming (I’m by no means an expert - but from reading on here think I know what I’m looking for). I measured it through the case with a precision ruler that goes to 1/32”. The dimensions I get are 1 13/32” (1.406) x 2 21/32” (2.656) for a total of 4.062”. I looked at a thread from a number of years ago where someone measured 500+ cards and listed the results. The width of mine is a hair over his smallest, the height is above average and the aggregate meets his mean total. This is a Sweet Cap back (not American Beauty). Do any of you more experienced gentlemen see anything that shouts altered to you? It’s in an SGC 3 holder. It shows even corner wear, no dog ears etc. but does display a gap at the edge. I know with SGC that’s a less reliable indicator than PSA. See pics below. Thank you for your input.
![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
T206 HOF Set (69/74) https://www.flickr.com/photos/197085...77720322768299 T206 HOF Portrait Set (29/29) https://www.flickr.com/gp/197085578@N03/8L309698CT T206 OMSL Set (1/48) Last edited by Wanaselja; 10-14-2020 at 05:31 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks fine to me; hard to fake that corner/edge wear combo, IMO.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 10-14-2020 at 05:32 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks fine to me
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, wouldn't sweat that Johnson one bit. You're talking 1/32(.03)" narrower than what it "should" be. That could be a factory cut, a little wear or measuring accuracy. Don't lose sleep over that card.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you for the feedback, it's much appreciated.
I must admit that when I looked up T206 sizes last night to double check I read it as 1 5/8" wide. I just looked again and see my error. Last edited by Wanaselja; 10-14-2020 at 06:05 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks good to me
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’ll take it off your hands if it’s keeping you up at night 😉
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wajo looks good to me too. Sometimes SGC's black inner gaskets holding the cards can vary in size, and be a little larger, giving the illusion that the card is narrower/shorter.
The OP's Bradley obviously looks narrow, but I'll add that the fat borders top & bottom enhance the illusion of it being narrow (and I do think it is either trimmed, or has a funky cut from the factory, which can happen)... Here's an "A" I have, I believe it has a "funky cut" from the factory, but tough to know for sure. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC slabbing as authentic? Question... | jchcollins | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 02-05-2019 10:16 AM |
Question: why not buy authentic over low grades? | Pythonfactory | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 12-27-2012 10:58 PM |
SGC Authentic Question???? | jg8422 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-10-2011 07:39 AM |
SCG Authentic Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-24-2008 10:34 AM |
SGC Authentic question? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-22-2006 09:54 PM |