![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For lower end cards like those 2 my most important thing is no creases, paper loss, or markings on the players face. Then registration, color, severity of creases, paper loss, holes, and any added markings on the card.
Things that don't matter are centering and corner wear. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I prefer the bottom card, but could live with either. Creases aren't a deal breaker if they aren't that distracting, such as over the face or a focal point. I also tend to stay away from paper loss and markings. Certainly can be more forgiving on cards that are much more rare. With a card like the Cobb, if it's a common back, you have MANY opportunities to find an example that appeals to you.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Of those two, I prefer the second one.
Having said that, I would honestly reject both, and keep looking. Steve
__________________
Successful BST deals with eliotdeutsch, gonzo, jimivintage, Leon, lharris3600, markf31, Mrc32, sb1, seablaster, shammus, veloce. Current Wantlist: 1909 Obak Howard (Los Angeles) (no frame on back) 1910 E90-2 Gibson, Hyatt, Maddox |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know for a lot of vintage collectors, centering is the first thing they notice. For me, however, it's corner wear. Then it's creasing, and finally centering, in terms of prioritizing. Oh, I forgot about registration, which would be about equal to centering in my opinion.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For low grade, centering first, then registration followed by corners. I try and avoid creases if possible. Depending on the card, creases are not a deal breaker. Since the centering is about equal on your two examples, I'd prefer the bottom one since it has less creasing.
Want to add that I also try and avoid major paper loss. Minor paper loss on the back is acceptable depending on severity and location. Last edited by DeanH3; 09-27-2020 at 10:57 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm OCD about centering so that always comes first for me, colors and corners can be interchangeable depending on the card, for example, corners are least important on a card like an E224. Or that Cobb E98 that's currently for sale that has that white spot between his head and his glove. If I bought that card all I would do is stare at that white spot. I'll wait to buy until I can afford the card that clicks with me instead of buying a placeholder.
Last edited by Casey2296; 09-28-2020 at 05:56 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd say the two cards you showed make it really easy to select the one without the heavy creasing. I'm usually a sucker for registration and colors first, but the misregistration on card #2 is very light to be almost unnoticeable. Two large creases through the image would make #1 very far behind the first one.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Marquard portrait SC - great centering, decent corners, lt creases | scooter729 | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 08-02-2020 06:34 PM |
Nice color, no creases just trimmed on the sides | chriskim | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-20-2019 10:04 PM |
T206 Sweeney Color Shift & Miscut Back, NM corners! **SOLD** | CMIZ5290 | T206 cards B/S/T | 22 | 09-01-2015 05:55 PM |
Pending Bowman #18 Warren Spahn RC PSA GREAT EYE APPEAL. NO CREASES $89 | brian29575 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-06-2014 06:11 AM |
1887 TOBIN LITHOGRAPH Color CAP ANSON NO Creases | bryanshaw | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-10-2011 07:05 PM |