![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To me - regarding this issue specifically - a few well placed caramel stains enhances the eye appeal!
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Unstained Cracker Jacks of WaJo would be beyond my collecting budget!
__________________
Seeking very scarce/rare cards for my Sam Rice master collection, e.g., E210 York Caramel Type 2 (upgrade), 1931 W502, W504 (upgrade), W572 sepia, W573, 1922 Haffner's Bread, 1922 Keating Candy, 1922 Witmor Candy Type 2 (vertical back), 1926 Sports Co. of Am. with ad & blank backs. Also 1917 Merchants Bakery & Weil Baking cards of WaJo. Also E222 cards of Lipe, Revelle & Ryan. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Having a stain on the 14 CJ would be a must for me. Its like having a stamp with the postmark on the back of an old postcard. It validates it!!!! Plus you know it hasnt been cleaned!!!
__________________
Love Ty Cobb rare items and baseball currency from the 19th Century. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do not mind the staining on the 1914 CJ, but the grading disparities when stains are present was enough to discourage me from going any farther than the two Detroit Tigers cards I own. The condition of the #122 Bush is a decent mid-quality card, but I have no doubts PSA would “only” grade somewhere between a 2 or 3 with the present stains. #114 Moriarity not nearly that high. Then I note how strong the 2018- 2020 auction results have been for #122 Bush, and I am not as discouraged. Perhaps the prices realized reflect this card may be as scarce as the low PSA submission count indicates. It all just bogles my simple mind. And, as noted by other members, PSA has not remained consistent over time, on the consideration of staining in assigned final grade. Would be curious to know whether some of the highest graded examples were “treated” in prior years to minimize appearance of stains. Suppose it possible less stained examples survived their time in the box. All that said, my kudos to all of the Net 54 OC members that collect them. You are a hardy bunch
. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd take a Chas. Bender any way I could get it!
__________________
"When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea. Thank you very much." -Eric Cantona |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So wondering which of the two grading services would be preferable to use when submitting stained 1914 Cracker Jack cards? Or is it a craps shoot?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the eye appeal matters more on these then the overall grade does, especially on rare cards like 14 CJs. These are special to own regardlesss of the grade. Personally I prefer them in SGC holders because they look really good against the black background.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I have seen 12 higher graded ones (PSA 7s and 8s) with the stain designator (ST) on PSA graded cards, I haven't seen them on any SGC graded cards. This card is an example from PSA Card Facts currently in another collection. Tony |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I Prefer My Cracker Jacks Stained | ksfarmboy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 60 | 04-03-2017 10:42 AM |
Trading 1914 Cracker Jacks for 1914/1915 CJ | ecRich | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 07-12-2014 08:03 PM |
Looking to buy 1914 Cracker Jacks | usernamealreadytaken | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 04-14-2012 10:31 AM |
1914 Cracker Jacks | usernamealreadytaken | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 04-02-2012 09:20 AM |
1914 Cracker Jacks available | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2008 04:39 PM |