![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
T205 Hoblitzell no-stats is one y'all may have already mentioned.
Ted, I believe the Rhoades coupon is the "with glove" picture. Here's one from the gfg website, that I missed about 10 years ago. It would be interesting to see what a Rhoades coupon would sell for. I have it at about the 8th most difficult to find, based on the pop reports. The T3 set has a lot more collectors, which could drive the price. I know I picked up the Murray KC on ebay for $60.50, even though it was a holy-grail type card that had been on my want-list for 20 years.
__________________
Want to buy or trade for T213-1 (Bob Rhoades) Other Louisiana issues T216 T215 T214 T213 Etc |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A couple of different categories here: Hoarded cards like the 52T Bartirome, and condition sensitive / hard to find centered cards.
There are a few mainstream media reports about the Curt Flood. Not terribly expensive but more expensive than it should be. https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/...-baseball-card As to condition sensitive cards, there are examples at the high end of grades in many of the sets from the late 40's to the 60's. The Gibson RC in 59T is very hard to find centered. But that's a star card. A few examples of non-HOF's or non-star cards of that vintage include: 1953 Topps Dick Groat, non-high number - the PSA 8 is something like 6X the PSA 7 and 60X the PSA6, where usual multiple is more like 2x more than the 7 and 4X more than the 6. It is the a non-high number and is the eighth most expensive card in a set at high grades, while there are about 20 HOF cards in the set. 1954 Topps Chuck Harmon and Ben Wade. Same story - exponential increase at PSA 8. These two are the 8th and 9th most expensive cards in a set that includes about 20 HOF cards. Another set of anomalies can be found in 1959 topps. The #330 Gus Triandos comes in at the 11th priciest card in that set in grade 8+. Not in the high number series either. Also, look at the last card in the set. Billy Pierce #572. It's really condition sensitive.
__________________
Bram99 You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it eat the dogfood Last edited by Bram99; 07-30-2020 at 10:45 PM. Reason: additional thought |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
You are absolutely correct, I posted the wrong pose of Rhoades for his 1910 COUPON card in my post #38 here. My bad. Here is my simulated 48-card sheet of the Major Leaguers in this rare set. 1910 COUPON (T213-1) Major League (48) subjects ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() TED Z T206 Reference . |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most valuable cards ever! | rdwyer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-17-2016 09:54 AM |
second year cards more valuable than rookies? | begsu1013 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 97 | 08-13-2016 07:33 PM |
most valuable signed cards | theshleps | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 9 | 03-30-2015 05:32 PM |
Most Valuable Cards in the hobby | Yankeefan51 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 01-06-2013 04:55 PM |
Protect your valuable cards . . . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-21-2004 04:38 PM |