![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So frustrating, and seems like 95% of eBay sellers now just rely completely on the scan or the PSA/SGC Grade as the full description, without writing a single thing about the actual card. Very lazy, IMHO... Their scans rarely show surface wrinkles, and to just say "PSA 3" or "PSA 4" tells you nothing. There are tons of 3s and 4s that are crease-free and just have some honest corner wear. But you'll never know unless the seller takes the obligatory 10 seconds to say so. That said... I am having an impossible time finding a mid-grade '56 Clemente. The PSA 5s are all way overpriced, and the 4s might or might not have "mystery creases" that you can't see on a screen. Ideally, I'd like to nail down a crease-free example with VG or better corners. You'd think one would be readily available, but the work involved is simply not worth it! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You really have to ask a seller if there are any wrinkles, creases or issues that can't be seen from the picture on ebay.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Commonly accepted grading practice before TPG's and going back to at least 1980 if not earlier, holds that "EX" cards should have no creases, or at least not anything resembling a crease on the front of the card. I believe that SGC's standard currently says that a 5 can have a light wrinkle on the front which does not break the surface and does not detract from eye appeal, but in practice it's rare to see that get a 5; many cards like that get lower grades even if they look fairly good and you can't see the wrinkle. I once had a '55 Bowman Kaline in a PSA 5 that had noticeable wrinkling on the front, but otherwise the card was NM-MT+. I guess they bend the rules sometimes. With raw cards, unfortunately you have to find a dealer who is reputable and does not routinely overgrade cards, as so many of them do these days - and especially with vintage. The better advice for anything of substance in midgrade is probably just to buy graded if you like the eye appeal. The vast majority of 5's from a reputable grader will not have a true crease.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 06-22-2020 at 01:05 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks everyone for all of the responses. I've got lots of reading to do, haha. But I did catch some points already. Mainly ask questions and don't throw out creased cards, haha. As far as graded, I'm not into it. I'm not going to buy graded. If I do, I would crack it out and put it into my notebook and go from there.
__________________
Anyone on Twitter? Here's my new handle @et_cardcollectr Also just created a Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/results?sear...t_cardcollectr |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Condition Expectations | sfh24 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 01-27-2019 11:16 AM |
Not having high expectations but... | x2drich2000 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 03-11-2018 04:08 PM |
1972 Topps Baseball Cards Wrappers (25) Lower Grade creased etc. | mintacular | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 12-06-2017 10:32 PM |
(SOLD) How Can I Build Some Credibility? Hmm...Sell some creased cards. hahah | kvnkvnkvn | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 28 | 10-19-2017 08:58 PM |
Are most T206 Ray Demmitt St-Louis cards creased? | Zone91 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 04-13-2013 02:15 PM |