![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for clearing that up!
__________________
Successful transactions with: Double-P-Enterprises, Thromdog, DavidBvintage, Desert Ice Sports, Kurtz Kardz, Cooperstown Sportscards, BBT206 and tenorvox! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No Wrinkle & No Stain = Probably 3
The wrinkled 2 actually presents better than the 3 and maybe even the 4 (IMO) ![]()
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 220/520 : 42% Last edited by toledo_mudhen; 05-16-2020 at 06:54 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They make up a set of rules, and everyone hypnotically follows along... it's as if Joe Orlando is The Pied Piper.
If slabs were never invented, there's very little chance that 4 would sell for multiple thousands above the other two. The eye appeal is no better than the others. I guess for some reason, they choose not to deduct for color abraisions? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about PSA grading | BlueBlood | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-26-2014 11:11 PM |
SGC Grading Question | magic1313 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 04-01-2010 07:12 AM |
SGC Grading Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-08-2008 06:43 PM |
Grading question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-02-2007 09:22 AM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |