![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For me, as a corner junkie, a wax or gum stain does little to me unless it is really dark and on the front. I’d rather have a solid card with wax than a lower condition with no wax.
Given that, I do I understand what goes into determining the technical grade.
__________________
Successful transactions on Net54 with balltrash, greenmonster66; Peter_Spaeth; robw1959; Stetson_1883; boxcar18; Blackie |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
According to PSA's grading standards Mint 9 allows for "a very slight wax stain on reverse". But as we all know, who really knows what any PSA grading team will actually agree on.
__________________
BZT |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Gum or wax? Wax absolutely can especially of a bowman, gum Stain no way.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No stains allowed on a near mint card (if I'm buying it). How much of a hit is going to be card specific based on a total of all condition factors.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was going to say I've had '51 Bowmans with the typical light wax stains get 7's
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would say that with disclosure that there is a stain, yes. But if you just list the card condition as Near Mint and do not disclose a wax stain, you set yourself up for a return.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Those don't count. They're printed on.... ;-)
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
51 Bowman -Wax stains or Gum stains? | pawpawdiv9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 08-04-2015 10:06 PM |
Wanted PSA/BVG 1 or PSA/BVG 2 1909 T206 Magie Error card (with no stains) | Zone91 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 04-23-2013 07:53 AM |
Foxing / Dirt Stains on card Fronts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-30-2009 12:15 PM |
Need a quick answer on this one - ref. stains on a card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-20-2009 07:45 PM |
anyone had any luck getting stains off a card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-28-2007 05:30 AM |