![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The price is based on the rarity of this card, irregardless of the player shown. Even if denoted as a common as Ted suggests, the card is very tough in any grade. In EX and above, almost non-existent.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 05-10-2020 at 02:41 PM. Reason: grammatically more grammatical now |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Perceived or Real? Scarcity of 1959 Fleer Williams Card #68 | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 20 | 10-12-2007 06:56 AM |
Perceived or Real? rarity of 1967 B Robby, 1970 Bench | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 32 | 10-11-2007 08:23 AM |
1969 White-Letter Mantle Scarcity, Perceived or Real | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 10-03-2007 03:34 PM |
E90-1 Cards are Rare In Comparison to T-206 But... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 08-22-2007 01:15 PM |
A lesson in perceived market value? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-16-2006 08:33 AM |