![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just found this on e-Bay. I've seen ungraded cards mislabeled but for a graded specimen, this sure looks like the plain black stitching and NOT the black over red.
Did PSA err? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If I had a nickel for every time I saw a PSA error... I would give them a pass on this one, though, they probably recognize all 1978 Jose Morales black stitch cards this way. It is definitely the all black ink version with no red. Here is one of my favorite PSA flubs, 1967 OPC Ed Spiezio LETTERING ALL THERE. There is no such thing as a 1967 OPC Ed Spiezio MOST OF SPIE MISSING so there is no reason to have that on a 1967 OPC Ed Spiezio card.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe their error makes it a variation in and of itself
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Like Cliff, I had 3 copies of this card in my binder, however, my 2 of my copies were slightly different than Cliffs. I went through my boxes of extra 1978s and found I had right at 50 copies of this card. In looking more closely at them, to me it appears that there are 2 versions of each of the "red", "black on red" and "just black" versions of this card, with the main difference being on some of the "black on red" and "just black" versions the seams of the ball appear thicker and less defined than other copies.
A-Black on Red seams on ball appear thicker ............ 6 of 50 B-Black on Red seams appear thinner than "A"........ 32 of 50 C-Almost no black at all.......................................... 8 of 50 D-Just a slight touch more of black than "C"........... 1 of 50 E-Mostly all black, seams appear thinner than "F"... 2 of 50 F-All black, seams appear thicker......................... 1 of 50 With my sample size you can get an idea of which cards are more common than others. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice work, I may need to buy one of your 32 ‘B’ cards.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is getting to be like the 55 Sullivan i
But now Larry has to list the order they came out :-} Last edited by ALR-bishop; 05-09-2020 at 03:42 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is an awesome thread. I need to dig through my 78's. Haven't said THAT in a LONG time. Rob
__________________
Want to buy or trade for T213-1 (Bob Rhoades) Other Louisiana issues T216 T215 T214 T213 Etc |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1986 Topps Traded Jose Canseco PSA 10 | Peter_Spaeth | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 08-01-2019 08:56 AM |
FS: 2019 Topps Heritage Lot- 10 SPs, Jose Ramirez Refractor, etc.- $22 dlvd | orioles93 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 06-17-2019 09:43 AM |
2011 Topps Update José Altuve psa 10 FS or FT | IgnatiusJReilly | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 3 | 11-13-2017 12:04 PM |
WTB: PSA 10 1986 Topps Traded #20T Jose Canseco | sc1201 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2017 01:22 PM |
lot of 26 Topps # 620 Jose Canseco Rookies NM... Sold ! | Leerob538 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 3 | 03-21-2013 06:28 PM |