![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Its faded and no way deserving of a 9. Wonder who the submitter was? My guess is that card has spent some time in the water
__________________
Love Ty Cobb rare items and baseball currency from the 19th Century. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Dumb question maybe, but how does that get in a new holder if it's an old 9 where the centering criteria is not met for how they grade today? Just because it's a Lajoie and it would obviously lower the value? I know people who send in older questionable grades for a reholder, Mantles for example - and PSA says sorry, we don't think this is a 7 anymore, it's coming back in a 6 slab and we'll make up the difference. Am I just being naive?
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But I can be sure whoever is buying this card is doing it for the 9 grade, undeserved that it is, and not the card itself.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess that's what I missed. In the example I was thinking of, someone sent in a Mantle in- but it must have been for a review in addition to a reholder. I agree they should stand by an original grade, but the whole thing just feels shady.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 04-24-2020 at 08:55 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You gotta think how much is at stake here. ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How many people crapping on this card will be bidding on it and are trying to push the price down? Asking for a friend.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
15 posts, one couldnt wager a guess, or an opening bid. That's just my guess
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I couldn't come close to affording it even if it went for a steal, and the "crapping" on that in a 9 slab IMO is very much deserved.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Goldin Auction is down | tmw2ward | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-19-2019 09:46 PM |
Goldin auction | Touch'EmAll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 03-28-2017 05:19 PM |
Goldin Auction Lot #877 | OldEnglishD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-28-2016 07:08 AM |
1952 Topps PSA 8 Mantle Headlines Goldin Auction Summer Auction- NOW OPEN for Bidding | Goldin Auctions | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 07-08-2015 08:47 PM |
Goldin Auction's evolution | mirice41 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 10 | 07-21-2014 01:19 PM |