![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most of that (probably over $3 million) will end up being a bailout grant that does not have to be paid back. Doubtful the funds were really needed - just a low interest cash grab loan IMO (anything left over after the first 8 weeks from receiving funds rolls into a 1% loan I believe) and Joe Orlando himself will likely get a free $100k from it. The PPP was supposed to be for small business that need the funds to keep people on payroll and help with some operational expenses. How's CU stock been throughout the pandemic?
Last edited by MULLINS5; 04-22-2020 at 11:41 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by perezfan; 04-22-2020 at 11:45 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
MY EBAY STORE; If you see something you Like PM me. If you bought off me and were happy let others know; if you bought off me and weren't satisfied for whatever reason let me know.. Last edited by cardsnstuff; 04-23-2020 at 05:51 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Payroll Protection Program (designed to provide forgivable loans to SMALL Businesses) was gutted by massive payouts to HUGE Fortune 500 companies. Unfortunately that was perfectly legal although it was contrary to the spirit of the law. The bigger banks like Chase made sure their biggest customers got millions while they ignored businesses like mine.
USA Today: "Some big banks have been accused in lawsuits of giving priority to requests for larger loans that carry heftier fees and come from bigger small businesses that have deeper relationships with the bank and are more likely to purchase other products and services." The bad press that was generated has prompted some companies like Shake Shack a($10 million) and Ruths Chris ($20 million) to return the funds. USA Today: "After numerous reports that Fortune 500 companies and other publicly traded firms were able to access the Paycheck Protection Program, the Treasury Department and Small Business Administration on Thursday issued guidance designed to prevent what critics call favored treatment for well-heeled corporations.: This week's program states that a company should be prepared to demonstrate to SBA, upon request, the basis for its certification...namely that without the funds their company will be in serious financial difficulty. USA Today: "It is unlikely that a public company with substantial market value and access to capital markets will be able to make the required certification in good faith." Hopefully the second round of PPP will accomplish what the first one failed to do. Stay tuned....
__________________
Frank Evanov |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, the radio news here said that banks brokered the deals for large companies once they discovered the loop hole allowing this. It didn't take long for that money to be gobbled up, leaving none for the small businesses.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Double-P-Enterprises, Thromdog, DavidBvintage, Desert Ice Sports, Kurtz Kardz, Cooperstown Sportscards, BBT206 and tenorvox! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The rules of the PPP CAres act explicitly state that the employee salary and benefits are capped at a value of $100k per annum. So a highly compensated employee can only receive a maximum of $8,333.00 compensation per month for the 8 week grant period, and health insurance cost and 401k employer match goes against it.
I don’t have an opinion with regards to whether CU should access the funds as a publicly traded company. The business also had to attest that the grant funds are necessary. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They wrote a convoluted law to do what could have been accomplished much more simply by directly paying 75% of payroll to employees for qualified small businesses for two months and covering up to 25% of payroll in overhead costs directly paid to the businesses. But if they'd done that the banks wouldn't have been able to rake off 5% in admin fees and it would have been perceived as a direct transfer payments to people (something they only do with tax cuts), not as a small business loan, so we get this bizarre 'take it, spend it, apply to get it forgiven' mechanism instead.
My take on the PPP is that the Federal government is making employers into unemployment insurers: It doesn't matter if the same employees are hired or if they even show up, so long as the level of employment (head count and 75% of payroll) is maintained. According to the SBA’s Interim Final Rule: “...the borrower will not be responsible for any loan payment if the borrower uses all of the loan proceeds for forgiveable [sic] purposes described below and employee and compensation levels are maintained.” [emphasis added] They don’t even care if you are open or have any trade to speak of, they just want you shoveling the money out the door to employees. I also think there is a really shitty bit of bureaucratic interpretation going on here. The initial information stated that you could use all of the money for fixed operating expenses at your discretion, including payroll if you actually need it, but the SBA’s Interim Final Rules modified that: “While the Act provides that PPP loan proceeds may be used for the purposes listed above and for other allowable uses described in section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) ... the Administrator... has determined that 75 percent is an appropriate percentage ... This limitation on use of the loan funds will help to ensure that the finite appropriations available for these loans are directed toward payroll protection...” The reason that interpretation sucks giant elephant ass so badly is that if you are a restaurant, for example, the payroll is the only thing you can control. If you are closed, you still pay your rent and pass-through expenses, interest, etc. That's what small businesses needed help with, not being unemployment insurers. And the spend and hope it gets forgiven? A hell of a risk to take. One of my clients pointed that out to me. I expect that there will be litigation over this eventually--regulators are not allowed to rewrite laws and the SBA explanation can be construed as an admission that the regulators understood the law but decided not to follow it as written. Honestly, there are so many inconsistencies and holes in this that I don’t think anyone has any definitive answers. For example, it appears that you could take the loan, hire no one, bank the proceeds, pay the fixed overhead (rent and utilities and so on) with it, and then apply for forgiveness of what you actually spent up to the 25% of the loan cap. When the bank then decides what part of the loan is forgiven, you could pay off the balance immediately with the 1% interest accrued to that point and walk away with a few months of free rent and utilities. It also creates a perverse incentive: since you have to shovel the money out the door at no real benefit to your business if you are actually shuttered and with the risk that you might even owe it if the loan isn't forgiven for some reason, your better choice may be to hire no one: your ex-employees can stay on unemployment and you don't risk owing a debt. Or you could hire your family and friends for no-show jobs to fill out the payroll for eight weeks then get it forgiven. Meet my new executive VP of strategic management: It is a stupid scheme…Sure hope I get my money ![]()
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 04-24-2020 at 01:23 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Honestly, this is shameful of Collector's Universe who CLEARLY did not NEED the $4.4 MILLION they received (about $3.4 MILLION GRANT). I know small businesses who can't receive as a whole only what the executives at Collector's Universe are getting, and a couple in my area have to operate at limited to no hours because of it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guess that CLCT stock would probably be a buy.
They had a small staff working, and they still need to keep the lights on. I'd wager a guess their backlog only has increased. I'm not sure people would be calling and cancelling their orders.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Contact me if you have any Dave Kingman cards / memorabilia for sale. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Anyone know the details of the chains that took it... was it some how going to franchisees? That could potentially make sense... or maybe the chains are slashing fees and royalties from the franchisees and using the funds to make up for it?
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Your business sounds like the “poster boy” for the type of business that this program should be helping. I wish you and all Small businesses like yours good luck and a speedy return to something close to normal.
__________________
Successful transactions on Net54 with balltrash, greenmonster66; Peter_Spaeth; robw1959; Stetson_1883; boxcar18; Blackie |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you, Bob.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Collectors Universe releases fourth quarter and fiscal year end earnings today | CuriousGeorge | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 113 | 09-04-2019 10:12 PM |
seeking alpha article Collectors Universe - A Scandal Waiting To Be Exposed | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 70 | 07-26-2019 12:08 PM |
Collectors Universe | Tsaiko | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 7 | 03-06-2012 12:39 PM |
Collectors helping collectors (please read) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-29-2006 11:30 AM |
Collectors Universe (PSA) Settles with Real Legends | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 48 | 02-04-2005 11:18 AM |