![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with Brock. It's possible that the player with no name used the bat, but it seems that there's nothing that we know that makes it probable. It's still a pro model bat of player X, and that's not a bad thing---but it's not something that would earn a 9 or a 10 from PSA/DNA. You couldn't honestly say "this is a bat that X used." As for your first and third questions, I believe that this is their standard language. I think that language will appear on their letters/ photos even if they go on to say that the bat has unique player characteristics or that there is a photo match showing that the bat was used in a pro game.
__________________
Seeking older Pirates bats. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Set Terminology | yoyot1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-14-2011 12:43 PM |
There's new grading terminology in the industry..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-20-2009 02:37 PM |
t206 terminology origins | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-10-2007 04:51 PM |
Terminology definition | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-04-2004 01:34 PM |
help me out with this terminology... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-02-2002 09:32 PM |