Newly Discovered Old Judge Player

[oldjudge]

That’s interesting. My old copy of the Cartophilic Society listing only shows (a) and (b) for Henderson pose 3. What listing are you looking at?

[Joe_G.]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

That’s interesting. My old copy of the Cartophilic Society listing only shows (a) and (b) for Henderson pose 3. What listing are you looking at?

I pulled this from a hybrid listing. There were a number of additions to the Cartophilic listing over a couple year window of research as we studied several notable collections (BB HOF, DPL, etc.).

[oldjudge]

I don’t have that additional variety in my notes, but I’ll check my cards. Otherwise, I’m lost. If it is correct it would be the only known example in the set.

[oldjudge]

Well, I guess I have lost track of what I have. First, I have the mystery Henderson pose 3 with Brooklyn. Also, I have a team change pose of Harkins. They issued pose 1 with Brooklyn (albeit misidentified as Henderson) and then updated it to Baltimore. It is interesting that each variety has the name at least partially written in. So, that makes two known 1888 team corrections in the set, still pretty rare.