Just a Note Saying Goodbye to Legible Autographs:

[BillyCoxDodgers3B]

The saddest part is that the players on the modern ball were either compensated for signing or at the very least were signing for charity (judging by the MLB hologram). I can even understand these kids doling out scrawls if it's for free, but if you're being compensated, come up with a more attractive representation. Many players do have two versions, but not too many of the younger guys. Hey, you're famous; if you're young and don't know cursive, learn it for just this purpose. You owe the people doling out money a little more than what is seen above. Feel free to scribble (or not sign at all) when it's not a business transaction. That's your choice, as it's your choice to sign for compensation.

Yet people line up to pay a David Ortiz a minimum of $200 for some loopy lines.

[mq711]

I think the terrible signatures is the main reason the autographed cards issued in packs are so popular, at least you have a idea who it is. Would be next to impossible to authenticate most current autographs on a ball or photo.