NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2020, 08:43 AM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 3,040
Default

I've mentioned these before but I never showed them with the actual cards scanned side by side. The 1967 Nen is on the same sheet as the three consecutive 1967 cards and is just as rare as those three so I would suspect that it was part of the same print flaw. It appears that the card to the right of the 1974 Dusty Baker is also affected but I haven't been able to find an afflicted 1974 Cookie Rojas yet.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 67 monteagudo-howser 1.jpg (77.8 KB, 380 views)
File Type: jpg 67 nen.jpg (79.1 KB, 371 views)
File Type: jpg 74 alomar-baker.jpg (77.9 KB, 379 views)
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2020, 10:24 AM
savedfrommyspokes's Avatar
savedfrommyspokes savedfrommyspokes is offline
member
Larry More.y
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman View Post
I've mentioned these before but I never showed them with the actual cards scanned side by side. The 1967 Nen is on the same sheet as the three consecutive 1967 cards and is just as rare as those three so I would suspect that it was part of the same print flaw. It appears that the card to the right of the 1974 Dusty Baker is also affected but I haven't been able to find an afflicted 1974 Cookie Rojas yet.
Thank you for picturing the 3 67s next to each other....is the Monteagudo a new pick up for you?

Here are two of my recent pickups.....not sure which cards border the Flood card and if there is any residual print disruption on those cards.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (78.3 KB, 371 views)
File Type: jpg 3.jpg (75.8 KB, 369 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-26-2020, 12:28 PM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 3,040
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by savedfrommyspokes View Post
Thank you for picturing the 3 67s next to each other....is the Monteagudo a new pick up for you?

Here are two of my recent pickups.....not sure which cards border the Flood card and if there is any residual print disruption on those cards.
Yeah, I got it recently from a board member who doesn’t post much. It’s a poor mans 67 Monteagudo error, but you take what you can get as rare as it is .
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-26-2020, 07:38 PM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman View Post
I've mentioned these before but I never showed them with the actual cards scanned side by side. The 1967 Nen is on the same sheet as the three consecutive 1967 cards and is just as rare as those three so I would suspect that it was part of the same print flaw. It appears that the card to the right of the 1974 Dusty Baker is also affected but I haven't been able to find an afflicted 1974 Cookie Rojas yet.
Now I have to move my Alomar that's just like that one out of the "transient printing errors box and into the recurring maybe variations section.

Nice to see another one.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-02-2020, 07:06 AM
savedfrommyspokes's Avatar
savedfrommyspokes savedfrommyspokes is offline
member
Larry More.y
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,042
Default

Found this recurring print anomaly on the back of the 61 Topps 151 Donohue card. In hand, at quick glance it looked like a crease, but after a quick check on COMC I noticed at least two others.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 61 151 a.jpg (78.7 KB, 319 views)
File Type: jpg 61 151 b.jpg (78.7 KB, 331 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-06-2020, 04:58 PM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 3,040
Default

I hadn't seen one in forever on eBay but one of the 1963 Topps high number yellow based/blue circle cards with the print flaw of a missing top black border line showed up, a PSA 8 no less. There are eight consecutive cards that were on the top (or bottom) of the original uncut sheet with the printing flaw of missing the top border line that starts on the first card at a little over a quarter inch and then gradually goes down to nothing on the eighth card on the row.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 63 klimchock d.jpg (76.6 KB, 314 views)
File Type: jpg 63 klimchock b.jpg (37.1 KB, 309 views)
File Type: jpg 63 klimchock c.jpg (34.3 KB, 302 views)
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”

Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 04-06-2020 at 05:38 PM. Reason: Missed a word
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-06-2020, 05:05 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,392
Default

Your eyes for this stuff is amazing Cliff. I thought I had one sometime back as the seller’s scan clearly showed the defect, but it was a stock photo by a familiar ebay seller
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-06-2020, 05:35 PM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 3,040
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR-bishop View Post
Your eyes for this stuff is amazing Cliff. I thought I had one sometime back as the seller’s scan clearly showed the defect, but it was a stock photo by a familiar ebay seller
Ha! I know exactly which stock photo you are talking about, this one right here. Wasn't it Burbank Cards that used the stock photo?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 60-542Fr.jpg (20.7 KB, 300 views)
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-06-2020, 10:56 PM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 3,040
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by savedfrommyspokes View Post
Found this recurring print anomaly on the back of the 61 Topps 151 Donohue card. In hand, at quick glance it looked like a crease, but after a quick check on COMC I noticed at least two others.
It goes into Eli Grba, I couldn't find any Fred Hutchinson cards with it so it may not affect it. I spent what seemed like two hours scouring the backs of 1961 Gene Conley cards looking fruitlessly for the flaw until it finally dawned on me that 1961 backs are upside down and that it would be on the Grba instead. ETA: I did it again, I keep forgetting 1961 backs are upside down so it didn't go into Hutchinson but rather it is at the top of the sheet.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Eli-Grba2.jpg (80.6 KB, 289 views)
File Type: jpg 61 151 a.jpg (70.0 KB, 294 views)
File Type: jpg 61 sheet.jpg (16.9 KB, 291 views)
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”

Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 04-06-2020 at 11:05 PM. Reason: Addition
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-07-2020, 08:30 AM
savedfrommyspokes's Avatar
savedfrommyspokes savedfrommyspokes is offline
member
Larry More.y
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman View Post
It goes into Eli Grba, I couldn't find any Fred Hutchinson cards with it so it may not affect it. I spent what seemed like two hours scouring the backs of 1961 Gene Conley cards looking fruitlessly for the flaw until it finally dawned on me that 1961 backs are upside down and that it would be on the Grba instead. ETA: I did it again, I keep forgetting 1961 backs are upside down so it didn't go into Hutchinson but rather it is at the top of the sheet.
Great work Cliff, thank you....sorry for your two hour detour into Conley's domain. Did any of the Grba's that you found with the back variation have the lower right border variation found on the front of this card?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (74.5 KB, 289 views)
File Type: jpg 3.jpg (74.9 KB, 283 views)
File Type: jpg 5.jpg (74.8 KB, 288 views)
File Type: jpg 7.jpg (75.3 KB, 286 views)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-07-2020, 08:38 AM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 3,040
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by savedfrommyspokes View Post
Great work Cliff, thank you....sorry for your two hour detour into Conley's domain. Did any of the Grba's that you found with the back variation have the lower right border variation found on the front of this card?
I didn't notice any Grba cards with that front flaw but I wasn't looking for it either. I didn't know it existed, but being on the edge corner of the sheet it's not surprising. Those two bottom cards are pretty extreme. ETA: I found a few nice examples on eBay. It's amazing I didn't notice any of these looking through the Grba cards the first time but my mind was focused on finding the print flaw on the back of the card.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg s-l1600grba.jpg (75.3 KB, 288 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600grba2.jpg (79.5 KB, 290 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600grba3.jpg (68.3 KB, 288 views)
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”

Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 04-07-2020 at 09:36 AM. Reason: Addition
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-07-2020, 09:15 AM
savedfrommyspokes's Avatar
savedfrommyspokes savedfrommyspokes is offline
member
Larry More.y
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman View Post
I didn't notice any Grba cards with that front flaw but I wasn't looking for it either. I didn't know it existed, but being on the edge corner of the sheet it's not surprising. Those two bottom cards are pretty extreme.
Until you posted the image of the corner of the sheet, I didn't realize the Grba card was on a sheet's corner....the location on the sheet clearly explains these (progressive) border variations and why no other cards exhibit similar missing borders .

Last edited by savedfrommyspokes; 04-07-2020 at 09:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1966 Topps High # Print Variations 4reals Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 9 04-27-2014 06:05 PM
Are these variations or print defects? savedfrommyspokes Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 16 02-09-2013 11:52 AM
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? novakjr Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 9 01-28-2011 04:32 PM
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) shammus Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 09-03-2010 07:58 PM
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors Archive Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 1 01-04-2007 07:23 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 PM.


ebay GSB