![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
x
![]() ![]() Hi Bill Sorry, but I don't trust any data that suggests that the population of cards #'s 171 - 180 is equal to cards #131 - 170. As we know....on a typical 100-card sheet (any series) of 1952 Topps cards, 4 rows are Double-Printed and 2 rows are Single-Printed. Cards #171 - 180 and cards #181 - 190 were Short-Printed. This is true regardless of whether they were White-backs or Gray-backs. I have collected 1952 TOPPS cards and filled customers want-lists for them for 40 years, so I've had a lot experience with these gems. Especially with the Billy Martin card. Every Gray-back Billy Martin card I have had, has instantly "flown off" my table at BB card shows. In fact, many years ago, dealers were paying me on the average of $400 for this card (irrelevant of its condition). TED Z T206 Reference . |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't believe our data are in conflict. I'm suggesting that, on average, there is 1 white front for every 6 gray fronts (1 in 7 total). If there are less of 171-190 (which I believe), there are less of BOTH gray front and white front versions.
Perhaps I misunderstood your comment. (I really do have too much time on my hands.) Bill Last edited by flkersn; 03-24-2020 at 02:22 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Each series was printed across two 100 card half sheets to make a full 200 card press sheet. George Vrechek has theorized for Run #3 (card #s 131 to 190): 40 players were triple printed, 20 players were quadruple printed to get to 200, or 4:3 ratio on shortprints.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I pieced together 4 scans of a 1st series partial (50-card) sheet to simulate a 200-card sheet....just like you noted. Back in the early 1980's, I vaguely recall seeing such a sheet of 1952 TOPPS cards at Bill Bossert's store in Swarthmore, PA. These TOPPS sheets were printed using 54-inch (or 55-inch) track width printing presses of that era. V---------------------------------------------------------------- 54-inch wide printing press ------------------------------------------------------------------V ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is an interesting photo from god knows where at this point but sent to me by John Moran and which gives a partial glimpse of series 2-looks like a final proof just before the press run:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1st series sheets are no help, as they have 80 cards, and 3rd series has 60.
2nd series is promising, as "the last row" are the sps. That would account for 180-190 being sps. But then why are the 4th series (2 rows) 281-310 sps
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
#251-270 appear to be 4:3 ratio to other semi-highs
Last edited by toppcat; 03-25-2020 at 09:52 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Okay, Stat Geeks...Time Was When... | clydepepper | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 0 | 05-02-2017 03:37 AM |
Gray Ghost mem lot #3 | GrayGhost | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 03-01-2015 01:20 PM |
Ted Gray 1955 | brimo | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 07-31-2013 07:34 PM |
Gray-backed Batter Ups? | Chris-Counts | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 10-15-2011 08:19 PM |
Looking for cards of Sam Gray | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-05-2009 08:03 AM |