Collect auction issue?!

[hcv123]

I'll try them tomorrow - me and my $$ are going to sleep.

[oldjudge]

The high bidder had a $1491 up to. His up to was the next increment thereby forcing you to bump two levels if you want the lot. Some auctions don’t allow this, others do.

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

what Jay said. Annoying but not nefarious. It's a strategy employed by a lot of bidders.

[Bram99]

Many auctions have a policy of the first person to bid a given price is the winner. Thinking it like a tiebreaker.

[GeoPoto]

Imagine that you are the other bidder -- he puts a max up at $1491 and then you bid max $1491. Are you thinking he should lose? This is the way every AH does it, that takes advance max bids. There is no other way to do it.

[hcv123]

Thank you for the clarification. While I believe you are all correct and nothing nefarious, not every auction house does it this way - I believe at least with one other house your top bid has to be spaced by a bid - ie. . you can't place a top bid of 1 bid increment over your last bid - a top bid needs to be 2 increments over your last bid (and in increments of 2 increments) in order to allow a guy like me to place a bid in between! Haven't run into the situation too frequently so not sure how most houses do it. The policy is bad for consignors.

Raised in a separate thread Collects "undisclosed reserve" policy:

"RESERVES: This auction contains property belonging to third persons known as consignors and lots submitted by consignors may include a reserve. A reserve is a confidential price agreed to by the consignor and Collect Auctions LLC, below which a lot will not sell. Collect Auctions LLC may place bids on behalf of the consignor for such lots up to the reserve. Max bids placed for those lots with reserves will be automatically bid up to but not above the reserve, or up to the max bid if the reserve exceeds the max bid."

What is the difference between the above and "shilling" up to the "reserve"? I appreciate that their policy is at least clearly stated and respect my right not to bid where not comfortable (which held me to bidding on only 2 items). I like houses that disclose - "reserve not met" or similar for items where there is a reserve.

Your thoughts?

[buymycards]

It also could have been the hidden reserve kicking in, with the house bidding for the consignor. See the other thread:

Well, according to collect auction rules:

"RESERVES: This auction contains property belonging to third persons known as consignors and lots submitted by consignors may include a reserve. A reserve is a confidential price agreed to by the consignor and Collect Auctions LLC, below which a lot will not sell. Collect Auctions LLC may place bids on behalf of the consignor for such lots up to the reserve. Max bids placed for those lots with reserves will be automatically bid up to but not above the reserve, or up to the max bid if the reserve exceeds the max bid."

"Make of that what you will."

"I would love an explanation of the difference between an undisclosed reserve that an auction house can place bids up to and shilling?"

[buymycards]

Howard, I'm not sure which item you bid on, but I see that lot # 174 closed at $1491. At the top of the auction page, it states that all final prices shown include the BP. So, if this lot closed at $1491, it didn't add the BP in the final price that is shown, which leads me to believe that the house may have bid on this lot.

Just speculating.

# Bids: 26
Min Bid: $100
Current Bid: $1,491
End Date: Lot Ended

Rick