![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Population reports from grading companies arent too reliable; too many collectors pop cards out for better grades. I would instead look on ebay and other auction sites for a better feel fro what's rare. I also think that if you sit down for a few months on ebay and catalog what T207's you see, you'll have a better understand of a) what they're selling for and b) what cards are being seen the most or least.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would love to hear what other cards people had a tough time getting. For me the toughest cards were:
Bauman by far Morgrige Cunningham Hoff Houser Hyatt Butcher Livingston Large C Donlin C D Thomas Rath White Scott Woodburn Adams Blanding McCarthy Pelty Any others? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dabbuu - we've traded and talked, and our lists are pretty similar. From personal experience, my toughest were probably Bauman, Mogridge, Cunningham, Ragan, Hoff, Donlin, Kuhn, and Blanding. I still need Miller, Lowdermilk, and Lewis but I've seen those for sale more frequently than the others I mentioned.
I lucked into some very tough ones. A few years ago, I bought a Houser that had been sitting on eBay for months. It had a punch hole and sold for something like $40. Since then, I've barely seen the card. So it's very tough but just wasn't one of my hardest ones. Same with Saier, which I got pretty early but also seems to show up infrequently. I honestly think there are many that you can lump together. I don't know that, say, Cunningham is any tougher than Adams. Or Woodburn vs. White. Or Ryan vs. McCarthy. Or ... you get the idea. To some degree, I think it's splitting hairs. Some are definitely harder than others. For my money, Donlin is way up there. But I personally think there's Lewis No Emblem that's clearly ahead and then a bunch of other contenders. It's just tough to say which of those, say, ten contenders, if any, are definitely harder to find than the others.
__________________
T205 (208/208) T206 (520/520) T207 (200/200) E90-1 (120/121) E91A/B/C (99/99) 1895 Mayo (16/48) N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100) N162 Goodwin Champions (30/50) N184 Kimball Champions (37/50) Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225 www.prewarcollector.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A Bushelman T207 SGC 50 sold today on Ebay for $797. It would get a MC qualifier from PSA, so not a high grade card by any means. I'd have to add Bushelman to those lists you've made of the tough ones.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For the most part I have stuck with collecting only the more readily available T207 cards, mainly due to the cost. The tougher 'Broadleaf' cards have always had a different look to me, which I think is partly due to differences in the artwork, and partly due to the fact that I just don't see them as often.
I have relatively few of the tough cards, but feel fortunate to have this Cycle back (my only one) of Hoff, and for me it has the bonus of having Buck Barker writing on the back. And it is a cool portrait image of the fellow who lived to be 107. Brian |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron - I'd certainly agree that Bushelman is right up there with many of those other tougher ones mentioned.
__________________
T205 (208/208) T206 (520/520) T207 (200/200) E90-1 (120/121) E91A/B/C (99/99) 1895 Mayo (16/48) N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100) N162 Goodwin Champions (30/50) N184 Kimball Champions (37/50) Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225 www.prewarcollector.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bresnahan's making me dizzy, Leon --
__________________
T205 (208/208) T206 (520/520) T207 (200/200) E90-1 (120/121) E91A/B/C (99/99) 1895 Mayo (16/48) N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100) N162 Goodwin Champions (30/50) N184 Kimball Champions (37/50) Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225 www.prewarcollector.com |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I believe that the grading companies would encapsulate it, perhaps as authentic, or with a qualifier, just don't think they would label it with a 'Buck Barker' annotation. I don't plan on ever letting their plasticky fingers get near it. Brian |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T207 question.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 06-05-2007 05:12 AM |
1954 Briggs Jackie Jensen Scarcity Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 05-16-2007 11:07 AM |
T207 backs question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-02-2004 11:38 AM |
assessing vintage card scarcity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 07-04-2004 01:24 PM |
T207 back question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-21-2002 04:38 PM |