![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Brian, that is quite a piece! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What about the ones with unnaturally rounded corners with number grades?
![]()
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ryan I have 78 from the set. It’s a fun set to try to complete, but a pain in the ass at the same time. You can’t be too condition sensitive unless you want to pay thousands for “commons.” I like my CJ’s more like your Matty! Staining is ok but I’d rather it be minimal. No variations except for Bresnahan. # or no # on the back.
If you pursue the set shoot me a text and I will help out best I can. I should have a handful of doubles. Connor |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rounded corners? That card does not look legit.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is no dignified way of saying "Dude...wtf?!?!?"
That card looks like when you're in 3rd grade and the weird kid comes in with a drastic new do. ...okay...I was the weird kid...but...still
__________________
http://https://www.ebay.com/str/bantyredtobacco |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I collected CJ’s, I’d want them to be as “stain-free” as possible. Just my personal preference.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
https://net54baseball.com/attachment...&d=1582632517; https://net54baseball.com/attachment...&d=1582632566; https://net54baseball.com/attachment...&d=1582632578; https://net54baseball.com/attachment...&d=1582632591; https://net54baseball.com/attachment...&d=1582632603; https://net54baseball.com/attachment...1&d=1582632622
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Stain or no stain. Whichever preference. Assembling the 1914 set in any condition would be an impressive accomplishment. I don’t think there is another mainstream manufactured set as difficult as this one.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
As you said, the biggies are already in place for you! Big CJ fan here......
__________________
Tony A. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Get Del Pratt next.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They pop up but go for quite a bit. The 1914s get pricey quickly. If I collected them I think a few stains, in unobtrusive places, would be fine.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I Prefer My Cracker Jacks Stained | ksfarmboy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 60 | 04-03-2017 10:42 AM |
Trading 1914 Cracker Jacks for 1914/1915 CJ | ecRich | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 07-12-2014 08:03 PM |
Looking to buy 1914 Cracker Jacks | usernamealreadytaken | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 04-14-2012 10:31 AM |
1914 Cracker Jacks | usernamealreadytaken | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 04-02-2012 09:20 AM |
1914 Cracker Jacks available | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2008 04:39 PM |