![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks more like a less detailed scan than an alteration and reholder
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agree. How could someone break a card out and get it encapsulated with the same serial number?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger Working on the following: HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) Completed: 1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wouldn't the reholdered slab have that colorful PSA logo in the middle?
That said, this is one hell of a scanner to eliminate that major horizontal crease across Wajo's face in the first scan (black background). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is the back. I would feel a lot better about things if it was just a scanner issue. Thanks for everyone's input.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know if I would call it a scanner issue. It looks like someone manipulated the scan to help with the aesthetics of the card. I'd expect to receive the card in the first scan.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My first thought would be that someone photoshopped the heck out of the picture of the card, but there are problems with that theory. Amongst many other things, the creases kinda squish the shape of his body and especially the face. Look how thin his countenance is in the first slab as compared to how squared it is in the second. With serious graphics skills, you could manipulate the picture to 'correct' it that way, but the amount of time and effort would be crazy (I won't even mention how much work would be involved in keeping the holder looking consistent and real) without any sort of true payoff (because the actual card wouldn't match the doctored picture in any way). I have perhaps another theory, but I am unsure how realistic it is, because I am not an expert on PSA's workings...
Say the person cracked the card out of the original slab (without doing too much damage to said slab) and went to town cleaning it, flattening the creases, etc., and was able to reinsert the card back into the damaged slab. Could he then have sent it back to PSA (not requesting a review or anything) to be simply re-slabbed, and therefore getting the same serial number?? Since the grade is so mediocre to begin with, I doubt the card would've been subjected to too much additional scrutiny, no? Absent anything else, that's really the clearest explanation.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What makes you think the alterations to the image are that severe? To me it just looks like someone messed with the color saturation.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1880s "Wright + Ditson"Trade Card "Low Ball" | Ben Yourg | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-17-2017 08:18 PM |
SOLD!!! T206 "TUBBY" SPENCER-BOSTON AMER! ONE "PHAT" CARD! Ends Thurs 9-25! | GoldenAge50s | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 4 | 09-25-2014 08:46 PM |
1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" | mightyq | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2014 01:28 PM |
1914 B18 Walter "Big Train" Johnson | Wildfireschulte | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 3 | 03-04-2014 12:11 PM |
Is this likely to contain a card?"1914 GAI GRADED 8 UNOPENED HONEST LONG CUT TOBACCO PACK" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-01-2005 10:01 PM |