![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
It's not that I won't collect a card that PSA has already graded, but I probably won't send them any either. And likely won't be interested in paying a premium either. Not like I did in the past, I have maybe 5-6 PSA graded cards, and most of those came out of packs. (I have an ACU-Grade graded card, so obviously even a sketchy grading slab isn't out of the question at the right price. And yes, it's trimmed.) I also really doubt I'll send any more to either SGC or Beckett. I used to send a few cards to SGC every couple years. Never say never, but I've seen stuff from both that makes me not want to give them any money. The stuff that's shown so far is bad, and in some cases, it goes beyond what I can see justifying a claim of mere incompetence. Sometimes I wonder how bad it would have to be before people abandoned PSA? As far as this thread goes, I think that a suit against two large resellers and the largest grading company is news that goes beyond the "Hey the blowout guys caught another one" |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I just skimmed through the petition. If the plaintiff really wanted to make an impact and see justice he should have included the outed card doctors as co-defendants.
It will be interesting if this impacts CU's stock and how Joe Orlando addresses this if asked in the next quarterly investor's conference call. I have one question for the lawyers on this board. Just about the entire case stands or falls on the scans of the cards before and after they were allegedly altered. What will the plaintiff's lawyers have to do to make those scans admissible as opposed to being just hearsay?
__________________
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." - Mark Twain |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'm not a lawyer so feel free to correct me, everyone, if the above is incorrect. * - obviously, it's fraudulent to trim a card and then sell or trade it to someone and not reveal it's trimmed, while representing the card as unaltered Last edited by Tabe; 02-17-2020 at 06:00 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You heard it here.
Straight from the horses ass The hobby and the board wont miss the deep insight, and PSA surely won't miss the revenue.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PSA isn't going anywhere and people need to stop trying to change other's minds on graded cards. How people spend their money is their business. Whatever makes one happy - more power to you. But for me, as I've said, no mas. PSA will never get a dime from me and their slabs have no place in my collection. I do like the predicament they're in, so the more threads the merrier.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I wonder if they were as thorough with their autographs too? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I've seen many PSA/DNA items fakes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who is good eBay seller to consign to (Not PWCC or Probstein) | BeanTown | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 07-21-2019 05:43 PM |
PWCC and Probstein shipping fees. | irv | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 03-18-2018 10:18 AM |
Court Rejects Class Action Lawsuit Against RR Auction | blrrauction | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 06-23-2015 05:57 PM |
Robert Edward Auctions has filed suit against a New York Catholic school... | thekingofclout | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 06-14-2010 08:11 AM |
Class action lawsuit against Ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-29-2006 05:33 PM |