2 1964 Topps Pete Rose. Which would you prefer?

luciobar1980 · #1 01-31-2020, 08:51 PM

I'm checking this card on ebay and plenty seem to have as much spaceas my 7, and some a little less perhaps. Is it possible that these card varied by less than a millimeter in their production? You guys are making me paranoid.

rats60 · #2 02-01-2020, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luciobar1980

I'm checking this card on ebay and plenty seem to have as much spaceas my 7, and some a little less perhaps. Is it possible that these card varied by less than a millimeter in their production? You guys are making me paranoid.

It very well could be short from the factory. There was variance in size right from the factory. Cards from vending were also sometimes cut slightly small. The probem is that unethical dealers have used this information to trim lots of cards and grading companies have slabbed them. I would rather have a card one grade lower that was proper size unless I knew the provenance of the other card.

RCMcKenzie · #3 02-01-2020, 09:57 AM

I voted for the 6. I was expecting to see the backs with yellow circles around fibers that show it to be the same card. Rob

ALBB · #4 02-01-2020, 01:32 PM

problematic and pissy.... lets set up a vote

View Poll Results: Which would you prefer?
PSA 6	15	40.54%
PSA 7	22	59.46%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FS: 1964 Topps Pete Rose SGC 70	Nugen	1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T	2	09-05-2018 08:22 PM
1964 Topps Pete Rose PSA 7	Peter_Spaeth	1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T	1	04-30-2018 04:53 PM
WTB 1964 Topps Pete Rose	Peter_Spaeth	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	3	04-16-2013 06:59 AM
1964 Topps Pete Rose - $15	sylbry	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	04-07-2013 02:21 PM
FS 1964 Topps Pete Rose PSA 7	Peter_Spaeth	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	1	12-28-2012 07:49 AM