Which set should I complete first?

[hcv123]

I guess it's a bit late to make a case for the 63 set! It is the one set I started - made it about 40% in and stopped. It is my favorite set of the 60's. 2 great rookies in Rose and Stargell. Mid career cards of some of baseball's best (Clemente, Mantle, Mays, Aaron) in addition to plenty more star power. Some tough high #'s (which I see as a positive challenge - not a deterrent).

Well, have fun doing the 65 - keep us updated!

[Brucepug]

Having done the 67', 68', 69', 70', 71' and 72 set in the last 4 years, I can tell you without a doubt the 1972 set was my favorite. It also was only my second to ever do, so its totally doable.

[jchcollins]

Originally Posted by hcv123

I guess it's a bit late to make a case for the 63 set! It is the one set I started - made it about 40% in and stopped. It is my favorite set of the 60's. 2 great rookies in Rose and Stargell. Mid career cards of some of baseball's best (Clemente, Mantle, Mays, Aaron) in addition to plenty more star power. Some tough high #'s (which I see as a positive challenge - not a deterrent).

'63 was a close second. If I can show some discipline with this one, and it doesn't take me a decade - '63 will likely be next. I do like the idea of chasing high numbers (even if in lower grade) at some point. Not really a big fan of the '63 Aaron, but the rest of the star cards from what I know are all pretty decent in the eye appeal dept.

[vintagebaseballcardguy]

Originally Posted by jchcollins

'63 was a close second. If I can show some discipline with this one, and it doesn't take me a decade - '63 will likely be next. I do like the idea of chasing high numbers (even if in lower grade) at some point. Not really a big fan of the '63 Aaron, but the rest of the star cards from what I know are all pretty decent in the eye appeal dept.

You can do it, John! It's just gonna take a little patience!

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk