Help IDing this issue

[Marckus99]

.

[swarmee]

Stacked 2x2, they definitely would. Or is this a Common Core thing I'm not getting? ;-)

-------------------         --------------------

|         |        |        |                     |

|         |        |        |                     |

|         |        |        |                     |

-------------------         |                     |

|         |        |        |                     |

|         |        |        |                     |

|         |        |        |                     |

-------------------         --------------------

4 4x5s                         8x10

I hope you get them ID'd. They'd be pretty valuable if they were a rare regional photo pack.

[Marckus99]

.

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by Marckus99

Ben,

FOUR 4x5 prints would NOT fit an 8x10.

Pretty simple.

Please educate me on how they wouldn't. I owned a construction company for a long time and think I am pretty good at simple math. Unless you are leaving gaps between the cards they should fit perfectly in my estimation.

[bswhiten]

The 56 of Mick that was recently added to the registry is the 8x10 on thin glossy paper. It is shown in SCD, why PSA graded, as 56 NY Action Pictures. It is also not an action shot No mini version is cataloged to my knowledge. There are many fakes of the 8x10.

[Marckus99]

.

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by Marckus99

Benny.....

4, as FouRRR individual 4x5 prints could not magically fit into a SINGLE sheet measured 8x10.

Hint: That would be 16x20.

Now if you stack them, like Johnny astutely highlighted....
You could amass all kinds of numbers.

I would highly suggest you take 4 4x5 pieces of paper and put them beside each other like John posted. Then measure them and get back to me.

Hint: 4 8x10s would be 16x20

[Marckus99]

.

[Marckus99]

.

[Jim65]

2 4x5 = 4x10
4 4x5 = 8x10