Shoeless Joe in the HOF...and his cards?

[packs]

If MLB knows the rules around the ban I'm sure the HOF does too. Don't see how it changes things for anyone banned. The guilty are not made innocent in death.

[wondo]

Originally Posted by packs

If MLB knows the rules around the ban I'm sure the HOF does too. Don't see how it changes things for anyone banned. The guilty are not made innocent in death.

..............except for Aaron Hernandez.................

[Snapolit1]

Always has been and will be interest in his cards. Frankly I thought all the Black Sox stuff would go through the roof on the 100th anniversary in 2019 and I didn't notice that happening.

[triwak]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Always has been and will be interest in his cards. Frankly I thought all the Black Sox stuff would go through the roof on the 100th anniversary in 2019 and I didn't notice that happening.

Thought the same thing about the 100th anniversary. Interesting.

[darwinbulldog]

I imagine that would only impact cards' prices to the extent that the 100th anniversary came as a surprise to the collectors.

[Snapolit1]

Originally Posted by darwinbulldog

I imagine that would only impact cards' prices to the extent that the 100th anniversary came as a surprise to the collectors.

Or if a boatload of publicity got new blood into the hobby. I didn't see much broad based publicity.

[C-mack]

It would pretty cool to see

I was fortunate enough to buy this card a week ago

[BeanTown]

Originally Posted by packs

If MLB knows the rules around the ban I'm sure the HOF does too. Don't see how it changes things for anyone banned. The guilty are not made innocent in death.

Maybe the people who said he is guilty, are guilty. Corruption goes both ways and there was a lot of pressure for those people who had a say in his guilt. What were Joe stats again in the series?

[packs]

Originally Posted by BeanTown

Maybe the people who said he is guilty, are guilty. Corruption goes both ways and there was a lot of pressure for those people who had a say in his guilt. What were Joe stats again in the series?

This is a pragmatic issue. If you were banned for something you did in life, dying doesn't erase what you did in life.

[Kenny Cole]

Originally Posted by packs

This is a pragmatic issue. If you were banned for something you did in life, dying doesn't erase what you did in life.

The question is, what did he do? A jury acquitted him. Landis convicted and banned him despite the verdict. I can see good arguments both ways.

[AGuinness]

Life, death, guilty, innocent, stats... none of that will change. I think the impact on his cards, as asked about in the OP, is an interesting question, and I could imagine a small bump surrounding the announcement if he were voted in. But I wouldn't anticipate a dramatic shift, as his status as an elite MLB player has already been baked into the price, as well as the infamy surrounding him - and that infamy, I think, is in the same ballpark already as his HOF status would be.

[Jim65]

Originally Posted by Kenny Cole

The question is, what did he do? A jury acquitted him. Landis convicted and banned him despite the verdict. I can see good arguments both ways.

The jury acquitted them all, does that mean they were all innocent of taking money and throwing games?

Thanks Leon got this one last year

[Kenny Cole]

Originally Posted by Jim65

The jury acquitted them all, does that mean they were all innocent of taking money and throwing games?

I don't know. Do you?

[Jim65]

Originally Posted by Kenny Cole

I don't know. Do you?

I don't think we will ever know positively about Jackson but the fact that a jury acquitted him is really irrelevant is the point I was trying to make.

[Republicaninmass]

We need lawsuits or it never happened.


I think prices baked in. In fact, this revelation would justify the run up on them in the last few years. Theyve gone a little nuts

[chalupacollects]

Originally Posted by Jim65

The jury acquitted them all, does that mean they were all innocent of taking money and throwing games?

It means the prosecution didn't prove it's case. That said he was not guilty so maybe the HOF does vote him in on that merit...

[Tabe]

Question is moot - the Hall clarified today that they will continue to honor bans after death.