![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Unfortunately, the answer is contingent upon who is submitting the card.
In this case, I would lean more towards tape removal (or perhaps the result of using a mounting corner) than a completely rebuilt corner. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Take it into a dark room and shine a UV light over it.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depends on whom submits the card>>>>that's the bottom line
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks more than lifted gloss. Looks as if the first layer of the stock is removed.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I haven't seen the card in person but I'm trying to nail down a fair price range for a card that already has a confirmed trimmed edge. The discussion is, how would this card otherwise grade if it hadn't been trimmed - like how does it show? The subtract from there since it's also altered. Last edited by RiceBondsMntna2Young; 01-14-2020 at 01:25 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ugh... everyone is still so hung up on a number grade. It's really quite meaningless to assign a number to this.
I guess if you were to pretend it's not altered, then maybe a 3 at best. If the tape (or whatever it was) took off more than just the glaze, and it lost the very top layer of paper, then a 2 at best. But either way it's an "A" so what does it really matter? |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know you're showing the area 'missing' the gloss, but the picture makes it confusing, as it looks like there is paper loss there. Can you post a picture where we can see what the card 'really' looks like overall? In other words, not in a way/angle intended to show a lack of gloss in a specific area, but what the card actually looks like in hand?
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Johnny630; 01-14-2020 at 05:41 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by RiceBondsMntna2Young; 01-14-2020 at 06:09 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I don’t begrudge anyone for wanting to make money/profit on their cards. I, just replying to why I believe people are hung up on the number grade. . |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Since the card is also trimmed, WTF does it matter what a hypothetical number grade would be? That's the part I take issue with. The card is an "A" regardless... case closed.
The only real reason (IMO) that someone would care about a hypothetical number is for the prospect of buying it, and later trying to re-grade or pass it off as a numerically graded card. And if this is really what the TPGs have "done right" (according to the OP), it might take an eternity to dig into everything they've done wrong. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by RiceBondsMntna2Young; 01-14-2020 at 05:53 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How does a card w/ paper loss grade a 4? | vintagehofrookies | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 07-06-2014 07:25 PM |
Did SGC miss the paper loss? | sportscardpete | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-20-2012 11:28 PM |
PSA 5 with paper loss? | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 01-05-2012 06:34 PM |
Loss of Gloss on Worch Cigar PCs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-22-2009 11:54 PM |
paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |