![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sgc maybe 1.5, if that is what you'd like. Least 2 creases
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would guess a 1.5. A 1 on a bad day, a 2 on a good day, but probably a 1.5.
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks accurately graded to me. I see 2 big creases and 4 little wrinkles. Can't really see that getting a 1.5. Nice looking card though.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They might give you a 1.5 for nice eye appeal and centering.
But I think too many creases and wrinkles to get a 2. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's a 1.5
Even though it is only a .5 grade higher, it means something. For whatever reason when I see a 1, I immediately think a card is torn, paper loss, pinhole..etc. I tend to shy away from them. A 1.5 is still rough, but I feel better about it. Maybe I'm just silly... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think this is the same card. If so, it is much more obvious why it got a 1 and it is well deserved.
DJ
__________________
Current Wantlist: E92 Nadja - Bescher, Chance, Cobb, Donovan, Doolan, Dougherty, Doyle (with bat), Lobert, Mathewson, Miller (fielding), Tinker, Wagner (throwing), Zimmerman E/T Young Backrun - Need E90-1 E92 Red Crofts - Anyone especially Barry and Shean |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great pic DJ. I agree now that there is no way the card gets a 2. However, I would give it the hook (1.5) due to eye appeal; it is a pretty card despite the numerous wrinkles and creases. Regardless, I don’t think it is worth the money for OP to send it to SGC for grading (or regrading) hoping for a better grade.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for showing your "Carlisle"My card is the same
blue ,and front has less problems? |
![]() |
|
|