![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My T205 Wilbur Goode is graded the same. It really isn't anything new with PSA. I think that if your card has more than one crease PSA will just grade it a 1.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's hard to tell from the blurry back scan, but it looks like there is a sliver of paper loss within the crease on the back of the card to the left of Tennant's name.
The PSA 1 grade would be due to that in my opinion.
__________________
Current projects: White Sox prewar type set White Sox T206 Master set 1952 Topps set |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If PSA is looking that closely at this card to notice micro issues that drop this pretty card to a 1 (and it should be no greater than a 2.5 IMO), then how the hell are they missing so many obvious trims and alterations?!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No,the crease shows lightly on the back.
But no paper missing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will give you a Fair on it
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sgc maybe 1.5, if that is what you'd like. Least 2 creases
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would guess a 1.5. A 1 on a bad day, a 2 on a good day, but probably a 1.5.
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks accurately graded to me. I see 2 big creases and 4 little wrinkles. Can't really see that getting a 1.5. Nice looking card though.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
![]() |
|
|