 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
01-08-2020, 05:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Some size variance is normal. I have never found physical size to be a particularly good indicator of trimming as a result (except in egregious cases). Even today, cards are not exactly the same size. If you take a stack of even 2019 Topps, you can see on close examination that they are all a slightly different size, slight but visible to the naked eye if you look carefully. This is even more true for vintage. 1954 and 1955 Bowman I have especially found to vary greatly in size, from post-war sets.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| '33 Goudey size variance? | brob28 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-13-2016 03:52 PM |
| T205 Size Variance | Centauri | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-02-2014 04:56 PM |
| T206 size variance | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-26-2007 09:40 AM |
| Size Variance??????? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-16-2007 07:20 AM |
| Size Variance? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-26-2007 02:19 PM |
Hybrid Mode
