![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
To the question of the thread, as for the T207s, I think they might be an acquired taste. ![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In my view, t207 has a cleaner look, and it seems to contain a lot of cards that are not in t206, so it seems, to me, a natural set to follow up on the t206. True, there will be lacuna, but when you make progress in the set, it will be clear that you have a collection rather than an accumulation.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow John W that's impressive on the T207. I am partial to T205 myself though.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
http://net54baseball.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=374475&stc=1&d=1574690005
http://net54baseball.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=374476&stc=1&d=1574690015 Last edited by GeoPoto; 11-25-2019 at 06:54 AM. Reason: Re-size pictures |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am enjoying building my T-205 set - love the cards, and not too hard to find (mine have received a lot more love, creases, etc. than the examples Leon posted
![]() Best, Ed |
![]() |
|
|