![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I’m not sure that alone means it’s short though; could also just be indicative of a centering issue. If you look at Jeter’s feet and his name on the front of my card, they are slightly high in comparison to others. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 11-10-2019 at 06:55 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Lots of room under his shoe, more than usual. It's a centering issue. A raw nice but not mint Jeter sitting in a local store trimmed? Let's not get too paranoid.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Thanks Peter. I think you’re right. I’ve measured it about a dozen times in the last two days, and if it is short, it’s microscopically short. At any rate, I have an SGC 7 on the way that should be here early next week which I will be able to compare it to. I think it’s a centering issue as well… Ironically it makes Jeter on the front of the card be a tad bit better proportioned? These damn modern cards, I really should stick to vintage. ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 11-10-2019 at 02:30 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Unfortunately that’s my specialty - usually with vintage. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Measuring it again is not going to change the result, the card is stable, I assure you.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This much I will agree is true, LOL. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1993 Topps Derek Jeter PSA 8 & 1993 Topps Gold Derek Jeter PSA 8.5 | wilkiebaby11 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 04-01-2015 08:59 AM |
FS: Jeter Auto Rookie Card & PSA 7 Jeter 1993 SP Rookie card. | Wolfgang427 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 10-17-2014 05:20 PM |
Really?? This much for a Jeter Bat | yanks12025 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 02-10-2014 06:59 PM |
Please sign Mr Jeter - NY Times article about collecting Jeter in Fla | RichardSimon | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 111 | 02-23-2013 03:48 PM |
1993 derek jeter sp and 1994 bowmans best jeter refractor | aclinton1107 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 4 | 02-12-2013 02:52 PM |