![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In these discussions, I often use the words worth less, but not worthless.
And, yes, there are uncertainties, unknowns, gray areas and matters of opinion and different viewpoints in this topic, including when trying to devise a market valuation system (which I am not doing-- in the current environment I don't think it can be done). Here and elsewhere in my life, I often point out that things, systems and calculations are inaccurate, and leave it at that. I've long railed against the PSA Registry because, for many reasons, it presents a false certainty, a false representation of reality and the statistical calculation methodology is incorrect. It's long offended my sense of logic and common sense . . . As an online game or fun showcase of collections webpage, that is fine. However, so much of the hobby and pricing and grading methods (and ethics) are influenced by the registry. With the current scandal, people are realizing that the Registry numbers and calculation totals can't be more accurate and precise than the margin of error in grading and especially alteration detection. No doubt, to some people and due to the prevalence of as yet unknown number of mislabelled altered cards, the Registry numbers mean nothing now. All they know is that the numbers can't be correct. In this very thread, someone pointed out cards in the Registry with wrong numbers (number graded cards that have been shown to be altered). Last edited by drcy; 09-22-2019 at 01:42 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great angle to proceed with, David. I like the way you are thinking.
I'd like to propose an alternative. First, let me say I have no skin in the registry, nor do I have six figures to buy the best of the best. Just an alternate theory: What if, by exposing the altered cards, it actually increases the value of the remaining cards? Now, this theory assumes the remaining graded cards are indeed unaltered and legitimate. Let's assume there are 15 PSA 9's of a certain card, and using your values they are "worth" $1000. Now 7 of them are deemed altered, and they are removed. They are now "worth" $30, but further, by definition they are not PSA 9's. Therefore the value of a PSA 9 remains the same, and all altered cards continue to be worth $30. Finally, there are now only 8 PSA 9's of this particular card. Does that now mean the PSA 9's are actually worth more, because there is less supply of them?
__________________
Successful transactions on Net54 with balltrash, greenmonster66; Peter_Spaeth; robw1959; Stetson_1883; boxcar18; Blackie |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1955-Topps-...gAAOSwlOVdgowK I would estimate value right around $33K - Seems to be no lack of higher than that "investors"
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 216/520 : 41.22% |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I hate to be this way but that’s my first impression of all PSA high grade cards |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Me too!!! And further when this high grade rookie “boom” began a few years ago...in no world that i live in is a card from the 50’s-60’s “worth” this kind of cabbage!!!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Granted 55 Topps of all the Big Cards the Clemente, in my personal experience, is the most difficult one to find nice, it’s harder then the others.... Still in my mind a Sold Centered Clemente 55 Topps 8 should be in the $20k range tops ......not $30,000 plus that’s Kabookie Theater.... Last edited by Johnny630; 09-22-2019 at 11:00 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() It is A SCAM pure and simple. Some still have some work to do and may never see it. Because people these days are inherently stupid and they don't see their hand in front of their face or don't want to. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Date Price Auction House Lot Number 11/4/2017 $25,088.00 eBay (battlefield0516) 132384001645 5/14/2016 $131,450.00 Heritage Auctions 80893 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It depends on whether or not the entire thing falls apart, because registry contestants no longer believe in high grade slabs OR give up on the collecting concept.
If people continually get scammed as they are, do they pull out of their collections and start selling off in quantity? Or do they continue to fill the gaps in their sets with the only remaining high grade cards on the market? It's kind of like this: ![]() Take the 1948 Leaf (baseball, football, boxing) sets, which have been found to be completely inaccurate. If one person who had 10 altered high value cards out of the complete set of 100, are they going to feel enough animosity to PSA to sell their 90 "good" cards or are they going to buy back the 10 cards they now need? How do they (or the market) trust their own "good" cards? What if it's 15 altered or 20 altered out of 100? Each collector will have their own breaking point. I have seen a bunch of collectors post something to the effect of: "Man, I hope these cards all lose their value because I'll be right there with my cash to buy them on the downswing!" But is that just talk? Are they willing to buy into a recession downswing?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by perezfan; 09-23-2019 at 02:55 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
@drcy
David... Please correct me if I am wrong... but to your credit, I believe that this is what you have anticipated regarding market pricing of cards, and have referred to in several prior posts. I am no longer a card guy, however I believe as "alteration" definitions are clarified there will be a fairly dramatic change from how cards are currently valued. Quote:
__________________
Focusing on Vintage Sports & Non-Sports Photography for over 25 Years. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS/BO: 14 PSA American Beauty Cards! 460's & 350's - Prices Dropped 5/17 | swanstars | T206 cards B/S/T | 4 | 05-17-2016 01:51 PM |
Various T206s for sale --cards added 2/09 and prices dropped | Kenny Cole | T206 cards B/S/T | 4 | 02-09-2014 05:20 PM |
Lot of 19 1972 Topps cards Price dropped. | buymycards | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-13-2013 06:47 AM |
Price dropped on various cards | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-15-2009 01:02 PM |
Proof the market is drying up !!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 11-16-2002 04:59 PM |