![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If, for a completely arbitrary example, 50 percent of PSA cards are misgraded, you don't calculate the value of cards per label grade by removing the misgraded cards and calculating only the cards that are correctly graded, but calculating the value of all the cards. The margin of error in grading and authenticating isn't removed from financial calculations but an integral part of it. As an admittedly very extreme example, you don't calculate the values of autographs with Coaches Corners COAs by calculating the values as if they were correctly authenticated or only by the ones they got correct. You calculate the values based on what they COAed and their worth. Thus, the misauthenticated PSA cards and the realization of the true market value are market examples of the values of cards in PSA holders and at that label grade. If representative of the accuracy/reliability/true identities and grades of the cards currently in PSA holders (and I'll let others on this and other boards debate that point), a "$1000" PSA 9 card that turns out the be altered and is really worth $30 that is an example or data point where the PSA is worth $30. Many $1000 PSA9 cards out there and currently being bought and sold are actually worth $30, so you cannot say the average value of a PSA 9 is $1000. And as it's realized that more and more PSA9 cards out there are really worth $30, the known value of a PSA9 moves further and further down from the $1,000 and closer to the $30. If PSA can get accurate at grading and alteration detection, then this will change. And maybe they will. But if they can't or don't or won't, the mistakes and BO outed cards are to be calculated into the market values of cards that are currently in PSA holders at a certain labeled grade. In fact, it's right now a nonsensical exercise on its face to try to calculate the condition value of cards in PSA holders because no one knows what are the condition grades of the cards. One certainly can't go by the number on the labels. One might as well try to calculate the condition values of cards in black boxes. However, it is a logically objective, financial and mathematical fact that the average value of the cards themselves are worth less than the values of the grades on the labels. That we know with certainty. Last edited by drcy; 09-20-2019 at 06:10 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great points, David...
But considering how difficult it is to “out” these cards, and the amount of time/research involved... we won’t know the true scope (or the real effect on pricing) for a very long time. God only knows how many more altered cards are yet to be uncovered, and how many are currently mired in collections. If a given collector has no intention of selling, it could be decades before the altered card hits the market and becomes visible again. Perhaps by then, the PSA Slab will be rendered meaningless (or even seen as a detriment). |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Correct.
The problem for the label investor is that the card comes with it ![]() Last edited by drcy; 09-20-2019 at 07:13 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also, keep in mind it's not just PSA ? Others {GRADING companies } have these over graded cards out there in the market , also ! PSA , might be taking the the hit for now, but they are NOT alone ? Thanks to all , that have keep up on this problem .
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They should always maintain their meaning: simple and attractive plastic slabs that allow you to collect cards that are different sizes and designs and stack them neatly on top of one another. You can even put an altered card in one of these and its plastic casing allows it to conform nicely to the standards of your set. I always liked this about PSA, and that their slabs are nice and thin.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my moto g(6) using Tapatalk |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If a card is altered, any number grade, except debatably 1, is incorrect, and the card is less valuable than an unaltered card in that number grade.
Humorously, PSA's own website states "Cards that have been trimmed have very little value." (link if you want to read for yourself, or copy for posterity) However, as was suggested in other thread, that line may be quietly removed at some point in the near future. Last edited by drcy; 09-21-2019 at 02:04 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would expect that the value of most high dollar slabbed cards, altered or not, would take a hit for this. Every buyer now has to factor in the risk that every card at that end they buy might turn out to be altered. I would be curious after a couple of years of auction data post scandal becomes available to see how much that “We don’t trust PSA like we used to” discount is going to be.
__________________
My blog about collecting cards in Japan: https://baseballcardsinjapan.blogspot.jp/ |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel. Marty |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i'd really like to know what's happening to the altered cards pwcc/psa is buying back as well.
THIS SHOULDNT BE A BIG SECRET...especially if they want we consumers to have any confidence that anything positive is happening. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A high grade altered card bonfire seems unlikely. Perhaps a moderate sentence of incarceration in the vault before hitting the auction block again will occur.
If the market gradually heads south in terms of return, the cards may get a reduced sentence for good behavior. ![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I thought someone said that they're being passed on to the FBI. If that's the case, it would be up to the FBI what to do with the cards. It was law enforcement that destroyed the autographs and stamped the early Pete Rose counterfeits.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
if this is the case I'd bet some end up going home with the agents!!!
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And that will reduce supply and leave holes in registry sets.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) Last edited by Bigdaddy; 09-21-2019 at 11:25 AM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my moto g(6) using Tapatalk |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In these discussions, I often use the words worth less, but not worthless.
And, yes, there are uncertainties, unknowns, gray areas and matters of opinion and different viewpoints in this topic, including when trying to devise a market valuation system (which I am not doing-- in the current environment I don't think it can be done). Here and elsewhere in my life, I often point out that things, systems and calculations are inaccurate, and leave it at that. I've long railed against the PSA Registry because, for many reasons, it presents a false certainty, a false representation of reality and the statistical calculation methodology is incorrect. It's long offended my sense of logic and common sense . . . As an online game or fun showcase of collections webpage, that is fine. However, so much of the hobby and pricing and grading methods (and ethics) are influenced by the registry. With the current scandal, people are realizing that the Registry numbers and calculation totals can't be more accurate and precise than the margin of error in grading and especially alteration detection. No doubt, to some people and due to the prevalence of as yet unknown number of mislabelled altered cards, the Registry numbers mean nothing now. All they know is that the numbers can't be correct. In this very thread, someone pointed out cards in the Registry with wrong numbers (number graded cards that have been shown to be altered). Last edited by drcy; 09-22-2019 at 01:42 AM. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great angle to proceed with, David. I like the way you are thinking.
I'd like to propose an alternative. First, let me say I have no skin in the registry, nor do I have six figures to buy the best of the best. Just an alternate theory: What if, by exposing the altered cards, it actually increases the value of the remaining cards? Now, this theory assumes the remaining graded cards are indeed unaltered and legitimate. Let's assume there are 15 PSA 9's of a certain card, and using your values they are "worth" $1000. Now 7 of them are deemed altered, and they are removed. They are now "worth" $30, but further, by definition they are not PSA 9's. Therefore the value of a PSA 9 remains the same, and all altered cards continue to be worth $30. Finally, there are now only 8 PSA 9's of this particular card. Does that now mean the PSA 9's are actually worth more, because there is less supply of them?
__________________
Successful transactions on Net54 with balltrash, greenmonster66; Peter_Spaeth; robw1959; Stetson_1883; boxcar18; Blackie |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1955-Topps-...gAAOSwlOVdgowK I would estimate value right around $33K - Seems to be no lack of higher than that "investors"
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 216/520 : 41.22% |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by perezfan; 09-23-2019 at 02:55 PM. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
@drcy
David... Please correct me if I am wrong... but to your credit, I believe that this is what you have anticipated regarding market pricing of cards, and have referred to in several prior posts. I am no longer a card guy, however I believe as "alteration" definitions are clarified there will be a fairly dramatic change from how cards are currently valued. Quote:
__________________
Focusing on Vintage Sports & Non-Sports Photography for over 25 Years. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS/BO: 14 PSA American Beauty Cards! 460's & 350's - Prices Dropped 5/17 | swanstars | T206 cards B/S/T | 4 | 05-17-2016 01:51 PM |
Various T206s for sale --cards added 2/09 and prices dropped | Kenny Cole | T206 cards B/S/T | 4 | 02-09-2014 05:20 PM |
Lot of 19 1972 Topps cards Price dropped. | buymycards | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-13-2013 06:47 AM |
Price dropped on various cards | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-15-2009 01:02 PM |
Proof the market is drying up !!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 11-16-2002 04:59 PM |