![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is just one Ruth - the pics themselves are a bit dark - here is the best imagery I could gather on the Ruth and Gehrig... Are period reproduction/fakes from the 1970s common?
Screen Shot 2019-09-15 at 9.56.52 AM.jpg Screen Shot 2019-09-15 at 9.56.38 AM.jpg |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just sayin, though the borders should be a shade darker than pure white. That Ruth just looks too dark to me. That along with near perfect centering give me great pause. These borders are darker than a pure white but not like the ones in the photos.. And I agree with Joe too, the colors on the Gehrig look off....
(I see there is only 1 Ruth, with 2 pics) ![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 09-15-2019 at 08:06 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah i just cant tell if its the tape thats making them darker - there is just a single ruth with that top corner lopped off. The borders are def off left to right it lt looks like a bit of a diamond cut on the bottom. I should listen to you two and bail on it - part of me wants to find out for myself but boy is that going to be expensive. Thank you both - i feel like im trying to convince myself my arm isnt broken as my doctor is putting a cast on...Here are the best version of the issues i can produce...
Screen Shot 2019-09-15 at 10.09.47 AM.jpg Screen Shot 2019-09-15 at 10.09.25 AM.jpg Last edited by kevinlenane; 09-15-2019 at 08:16 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey dude, this "scrapbook" has sold and has been listed 3 times prior for 1k to 1500. Did you really think for 5500 it "could be real" when others for the past few months have passed on it?
Greedy makes for a hungry puppy
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Republicaninmass - i had no idea that it had been posted and resold - I didnt buy it for 5500 - i made an offer for 800 but if thats true about it being posted and resold than I can certainly back away from it...thanks
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I cant find any record of the sales - can you point me in the right direction? Honestly i saw it for the first time this morning.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't offer an opinion other than the tape doesn't look terribly old.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I didn't know it was sold and resold several times prior either. That's not a good look I must admit.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed on the reselling - i just cant find any record of it being discussed or bought or sold - though it was stated with some conviction so its giving me pause...
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm going to go against the grain and say the Ruth looks good to me. It's being held down with old tape and all the other commons look good. I just don't see the Ruth being fake in that bunch.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I personally wouldn't gamble on it. I am not 100% but it (the Ruth) just doesn't look right. It could be the scan. Not sure about the back of the Gehrig either. If there is any really white looking paper, where there is damage, that is a yellow flag.
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 09-15-2019 at 05:20 PM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I dont like cardboard of the gehrig...
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The back of the Gehrig looks too clean... I've owned a poor one and it should look more faded.
Ricky Y |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I saw the listing and didn't like the look of the Ruth or Gehrig. I agree with a previous post that some cards look legit, but not the R or G. It's a bit difficult to see due to the angle of the pictures.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel. Marty |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Brian |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
your opinion, real or fake Ruth card | larietrope | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-12-2018 02:00 PM |
1933 Goudey Lou Gehrig Real or Fake? | MUhoops | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-17-2014 08:23 AM |
1933 Goudey Lou Gehrig card - REAL OR FAKE? | bobbyw8469 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-16-2014 03:22 PM |
1933 Goudey Gehrig--Real or Fake? | jburl | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-09-2013 05:34 PM |
1933 Goudey Gehrig #92....Real or fake? | paulgrubor | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-25-2013 07:36 PM |