![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks real. I don’t think soaking would hurt it, if done properly, but it wouldn’t be guaranteed to get all the paper off the back.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think more of the front would flake off during a soak. I wouldn't do it, unless you don't mind losing more of the border (and possibly image). It would really only make sense if you think there's a rare back hiding underneath.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’d be a little reluctant to soak it due to the chipping and flaking that you see. You might start to lose pieces of the cardboard and ink in the soaking process. I’m not saying it’s necessarily the case but I’ve soaked T206s before and had that happen.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks like either a Piedmont or Tolstoi back, based on what's peeking through the scrapbook paper, where you can see a "B" and part of a diagonal triple line in the upper left part, and part of the border on the middle right. Most likely a Piedmont.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm guessing it was soaked poorly or with a solvent already which might account for the crazing as it shrunk. Even the exposed paper on the front, which typically turns dirty very quickly, is still whitish. I think a water soak is pointless, and in fact dangerous as the card is very fragile at this point and the backing paper is actually helping to hold it together.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions Last edited by Aquarian Sports Cards; 08-23-2019 at 12:30 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Its good agree with scott
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
An$on Lyt!e |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah it's just a Piedmont back so nothing to gain.
Thank you to everyone for the help. The card is back in the binder where it belongs. And on a side note I finally bought a blacklight this afternoon and checked all of my cards and aside from a few overly cleaned T218's nothing seems to look fake. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I thought you were going to say that when you took it out of your binder that you could see a faint UZIT image visible through the scrapbook paper that wasn’t previously visible.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can I please get an opinion on these 3... | mr2686 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 6 | 05-04-2018 10:39 AM |
hof opinion | bobbyg | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 0 | 04-14-2015 11:37 AM |
ali opinion | w7imel | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 2 | 08-03-2014 06:11 PM |
What's your opinion? | sbfinley | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 9 | 06-03-2009 12:32 PM |
I need your opinion... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 02-06-2006 08:39 PM |