![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL I appreciate it but it was never mine, I was asked to join someone who was in a position to start one. I'm hoping he follows through, but I think the start-up and marketing costs are daunting.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
. Last edited by wondo; 08-07-2019 at 07:51 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As of right now, I don't believe enough people are willing to pay for reliability in grading. PSA would never do this because it would cost them revenue, and the overwhelming number of collectors wouldn't be willing to pay more for the security.
I like where your thoughts are, but the economics just don't add up until there's some sort of "technology" element that makes it better AND cheaper. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott - The idea would certainly leave the marketplace moving forward in better shape than it is in now - even with some of the pointed out "loopholes" and "imperfections". Far from perfect - but a large improvement.
Mark - The only weakness I see in your plan is the lack of numeric grading - There are too many in the marketplace that use the numeric grades as competition to be the best (think set registry and "buy the holder not the card) - take the numeric grading away and you lose that competitive factor which I believe is the one point of differentiation that has PSA so far ahead of the other grading companies. So, keep the numeric grading - add all of the other points of scrutiny. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well it wouldnt be hard to get an 'extra sticker' that says that a 5k card or more past sales search was done to see if any possible altered card. The search can name all of the searches and name all the websites/auction etc that would check
I chose 5k as an arbitrary number |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't do much with TGC. I have never submitted a card directly, own a few, but will generally crack them to put into my binders.
I think the answer is a new grading company with very high standards in terms of ethics and reasonable funding. That is doable. If a credible name was associated with it and the pricing reasonable, it could catch on. There are a ton of superior marketing angles that could be employed and technology to determine trims and centering could be integrated. It could be great. If such a company were to be founded, the existing card companies would throw everything they could at them to discredit them. It would be an absolute sh•tshow. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A modest proposal | HobokenJon | T206 cards B/S/T | 18 | 06-26-2019 03:42 PM |
My modest John Tavares collection. | irv | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 4 | 03-18-2019 04:40 PM |
A modest proposal for a new section | steve B | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 10-07-2017 03:21 PM |
A modest proposal for the Baseball HOF | Aquarian Sports Cards | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 12 | 09-07-2017 05:04 PM |
Modest Discovery in my collection (T206 back) | TobaccoKing4 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-29-2011 07:43 AM |