![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have collected cards my whole life, as a kid i just loved old cards because i was a athlete and read history
I never knew shit about card grading when i was young and really didn't learn much about it until the last few years when i jumped in again I want to apologize to anyone that i offended. I have studied thousands of cards in the last few yrs. Almost all 33 goudeys Sports kings, baseball and Indian cards all 1933. I darn near had the whole 33 goudey baseball set....60 cards short...had 2 ruth's and foxx and vance, bengough all in psa 8s or sgc 88s I only collect 8s or 88s. I have a shit ton of Indian cards in 88s and 36 sports kings in psa 8 and 3 in 88s I can honestly say in my heart after looking at all of my stuff that psa 8s are better than sgc 88s....as far as quality. Thats why they are less expensive. There are exceptions and when there is the sgc fetches a fair price. PSA cards are superior to sgc without a doubt in my opinion not even close. People say sgc rivals PSA in pre war cards.. Not my experience at all. Here and there....maybe. But, honestly I haven't experienced that yet PSA cards are far better. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
Tags |
psa, sgc |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GAI grades versus PSA/SGC | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 09-17-2015 01:05 PM |
poor versus authentic | darwinbulldog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-23-2012 08:38 PM |
Quality versus Quantity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-02-2009 09:47 AM |
original goudeys versus reprints | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-03-2004 09:09 PM |
1954 SI Versus Reprint | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-01-2002 01:19 PM |