E92 confirmed lists for difficult backs

[brianp-beme]

Paul is accurate in that he has the only known E90-1 blank back subject (Krause), because Krause is not seen in any other set but the E90-1.

I have removed E105 and E106 cards from the below list due to the points made. The below list shows the possible other sets (E90-1, E101 and E102) that these subjects are in besides the E92 sets.

Chase fielding: E101, E102
Crawford red: E101, E102
Davis sliding: E101
Dougherty: E90-1, E101, E102
Gibson back view: E101
Lajoie fielding: E101, E102
McGraw: E101
McLean: E90-1, E101
Miller fielding: E90-1, E101, E102
Schlei: E101
Seigle: E90-1, E101
Smith: E101, E102
Tinker batting: E101, E102
Wagner throwing: E90-1, E101, E102
Zimmerman: E101, E102

As you can see, besides all these cards being in the E92 sets, they are all also in the E101. With Paul's E90-1 Krause showing that it is possible for E90-1 cards (and thus other sets) to have blank backs, I think we can only narrow things down to the above list, unless there are some recognizable printing differences between sets of the same subject.

Just like tobacco cards and blank backs being seen in all the major sets, my guess is that E90-1, E101 and E102 could possibly be the source of these blank backs.

Everybody have fun trying to figure all this blank back action out!

Brian

[RCMcKenzie]

Here's a McGraw blank back from Goodwin. It says T216 on the holder, but I bought it as a non-advertisement card for the back run. In other words, I don't need any more blank backs for my back run. It sort of looks like a T216, I guess...

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by RCMcKenzie

Here's a McGraw blank back from Goodwin. It says T216 on the holder, but I bought it as a non-advertisement card for the back run. In other words, I don't need any more blank backs for my back run. It sort of looks like a T216, I guess...

my approach is different for my miller run...I feel it is not complete without both the e92 and the t216 bb's...just my preference.

Then again, the front captions are different...Pitt for e92 St Louis for t216.

Disclaimer...the e92 posted is not mine!

[x2drich2000]

Pete, do you also have the Crawford T216 blank back?I can't remember if it is you or someone else.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by x2drich2000

Pete, do you also have the Crawford T216 blank back?I can't remember if it is you or someone else.

i do believe i do!

[ullmandds]

in retrospect i wish I bought them all!!!!

[x2drich2000]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

i do believe i do!

If I remember correctly there is a space in the c. f. that distinguishes it from the e92/e101 example shown above.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by x2drich2000

If I remember correctly there is a space in the c. f. that distinguishes it from the e92/e101 example shown above.

that I am NOT aware of?

[Leon]

Originally Posted by RCMcKenzie

Here's a McGraw blank back from Goodwin. It says T216 on the holder, but I bought it as a non-advertisement card for the back run. In other words, I don't need any more blank backs for my back run. It sort of looks like a T216, I guess...

First off, great work on these back combinations, DJ!!

As for the T216 McGraw, does it have a glossy front? I would go with the Goodwin assessment because (as you and most others probably know) there were a lot of T216s he sold from a find, which were hand cut and blank backed.

Here are some I used to own, mostly from that find...

[RCMcKenzie]

Leon, yes the McGraw was from that same sale I think. The Gibson you had has similar scribbling on the back to the McGraw. I don't recall the backstory of the find. Looking at the card, I thought it also looks like an e106 with the gloss. Anyway, I'm glad I was able to get it at auction when I did.

[RCMcKenzie]

SGC labeled "A" and they designate it on the flip "e101"